Friday, August 25, 2017

Re: Anybody watch Roots?

May 31, '16, 9:12 am
didymus's Avatar
Veteran Member
Radio Club Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2005
Posts: 10,387
Religion: Catholic
Default Anybody watch Roots?

I missed it, what did you think of it?
__________________
It's not hoarding if it's BOOKS.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 31, '16, 11:01 am
Banned
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,112
Religion: Catholic. I leave the adjectives to wiser heads.
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by didymus View Post
I missed it, what did you think of it?
The series based on Alex Haley's book? Or am I just dating myself hopelessly?

Nope. But I've read the book. Great read.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 31, '16, 11:13 am
thephilosopher6's Avatar
Regular Member
Greeter
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: October 5, 2015
Posts: 1,465
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by didymus View Post
I missed it, what did you think of it?
I missed the first few minutes but I did catch most of it. I thought it was a wonderful adaptation and remake of the original. Slavery was a horrible period in American history. In fact, It was a horrible period in human history
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 31, '16, 2:43 pm
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

There is a remake of "Roots" coming out. Stories like these make for interesting entertainment, but old wounds never heal when they are constantly picked at. There have been a lot of slavery movies and TV lately. This can't help but to foster more feelings of guilt and resentment and that is not healthy for a society. At some point you have to let go of the 'bad old days' and move on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 31, '16, 4:31 pm
Dwyer's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Byzantine Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

I think the remake so far is intense drama but keep in mind the book Roots by Alex Haley is a work of historical fiction.

However, the History Channel is billing Roots as a "Historical Presentation" in their viewer language warning at the beginning.
__________________


"It's a free country; you can say whatever you want."

--Old American Saying

(U.S. Postal Service stamp-- from 1977 Americana series which extols freedom of speech and features a Speaker's Stand decorated with an American Flag shield.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 31, '16, 5:26 pm
New Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2016
Posts: 293
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

There's a remake of Roots out?

(I'm sorry for being so off-topic, but why are we being practically assaulted with remakes and sequels these days?)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 31, '16, 5:34 pm
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,710
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
I think the remake so far is intense drama but keep in mind the book Roots by Alex Haley is a work of historical fiction.

However, the History Channel is billing Roots as a "Historical Presentation" in their viewer language warning at the beginning.
I saw the first segment. A bit long on "every white European is bad and Islam is good". Even the black slavers are asserted to be doing it only because of English money. But the slavery in their own societies was benign, we're assured.

And frankly, that whipping scene over the main character's name strikes me as improbable. A strong, young male slave back then cost about $50,000 in today's money. Maybe slave owners would risk that investment over a slave's using an African name, but I have my doubts. Seems to me he was doing his work, which I suspect was all that really mattered very much to slave owners at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 31, '16, 5:44 pm
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,710
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaetenturCaeli View Post
There's a remake of Roots out?

(I'm sorry for being so off-topic, but why are we being practically assaulted with remakes and sequels these days?)
Shortage of creative people, perhaps? Perhaps also unwillingness to take risks on altogether new stories?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 31, '16, 8:01 pm
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridgerunner View Post
I saw the first segment. A bit long on "every white European is bad and Islam is good". Even the black slavers are asserted to be doing it only because of English money. But the slavery in their own societies was benign, we're assured.

And frankly, that whipping scene over the main character's name strikes me as improbable. A strong, young male slave back then cost about $50,000 in today's money. Maybe slave owners would risk that investment over a slave's using an African name, but I have my doubts. Seems to me he was doing his work, which I suspect was all that really mattered very much to slave owners at the time.
Oh, yes!...Islam was wonderful for the slaves! I have read that there were far more slaves imported to Arabia than to the Americas, and the Arabs treated them much more cruelly. The males were routinely castrated. The death toll was horrendous. Modern Arabs still treat blacks badly, calling them "abid" which means "slave".
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 31, '16, 9:51 pm
Banned
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,112
Religion: Catholic. I leave the adjectives to wiser heads.
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
I think the remake so far is intense drama but keep in mind the book Roots by Alex Haley is a work of historical fiction.

However, the History Channel is billing Roots as a "Historical Presentation" in their viewer language warning at the beginning.
Absolutely.

Also, some parts of the novel were plagiarized from a book called "The African" by Harold Courlander.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Jun 1, '16, 4:06 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2011
Posts: 4,391
Religion: Orthodox
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

I tried. But we had a bad thunderstorm, and the power and satellite kept going out. Yes in the desert!
__________________
Kyrie Eleison Imas!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Jun 1, '16, 4:38 pm
Dwyer's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Byzantine Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewstx View Post
I tried. But we had a bad thunderstorm, and the power and satellite kept going out. Yes in the desert!
You didn't really miss out on anything.

The first episode was interesting but the second episode was just a 2 hour display of low level human behavior from both of the races.

Kunta Kinte is portrayed as having a full blown eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, Islamic Mandinka Warrior complex, and encourages his young daughter's male house slave friend to harbor thoughts of murder and revenge against their masters. It is mentioned that Kunta's young daughter, Kizzy, is an Atheist.

The entire Plantation white family, except perhaps their young daughter who befriends Kizzy, is portrayed as mean, petty, adulterous, and cruel.

Fiddler was perhaps the only decent character but in the end even he can't forgive those who have trespassed against him.

The whole emphasis and message of this version of the Roots story is not a good one; so far it's all about vengeance and hate for the other and I don't think I'm going to spend much more time watching it.
__________________


"It's a free country; you can say whatever you want."

--Old American Saying

(U.S. Postal Service stamp-- from 1977 Americana series which extols freedom of speech and features a Speaker's Stand decorated with an American Flag shield.)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Jun 1, '16, 4:50 pm
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 26,606
Religion: Jewish
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
You didn't really miss out on anything.

The first episode was interesting but the second episode was just a 2 hour display of low level human behavior from both of the races.

Kunta Kinte is portrayed as having a full blown eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, Islamic Mandinka Warrior complex, and encourages his young daughter's male house slave friend to harbor thoughts of murder and revenge against their masters. It is mentioned that Kunta's young daughter, Kizzy, is an Atheist.

The entire Plantation white family, except perhaps their young daughter who befriends Kizzy, is portrayed as mean, petty, adulterous, and cruel.

Fiddler was perhaps the only decent character but in the end even he can't forgive those who have trespassed against him.

The whole emphasis and message of this version of the Roots story is not a good one; so far it's all about vengeance and hate for the other and I don't think I'm going to spend much more time watching it.
l agree with you. There is little to compare with the brilliant original version or the book, for that matter.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Jun 1, '16, 7:01 pm
Banned
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,112
Religion: Catholic. I leave the adjectives to wiser heads.
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
You didn't really miss out on anything.

The first episode was interesting but the second episode was just a 2 hour display of low level human behavior from both of the races.

Kunta Kinte is portrayed as having a full blown eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, Islamic Mandinka Warrior complex, and encourages his young daughter's male house slave friend to harbor thoughts of murder and revenge against their masters.
Ugh. In the original book, there is a very brief mention of revenge while they are all being herded on the slavers' ship, but not thereafter. Kunta is a Muslim, but certainly not a "warrior" as such.

Quote:
It is mentioned that Kunta's young daughter, Kizzy, is an Atheist.
Very unlikely, as her mother is clearly depicted as a Protestant.

Quote:
The entire Plantation white family, except perhaps their young daughter who befriends Kizzy, is portrayed as mean, petty, adulterous, and cruel.
Again, this was not explicitly stated in the book.

Quote:
Fiddler was perhaps the only decent character but in the end even he can't forgive those who have trespassed against him.

The whole emphasis and message of this version of the Roots story is not a good one; so far it's all about vengeance and hate for the other and I don't think I'm going to spend much more time watching it.
Poor Fiddler. Looks like they did a number on him too.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why you should Just. Read. The. Book.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Jun 2, '16, 11:13 pm
didymus's Avatar
Veteran Member
Radio Club Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2005
Posts: 10,387
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
You didn't really miss out on anything.

The first episode was interesting but the second episode was just a 2 hour display of low level human behavior from both of the races.

Kunta Kinte is portrayed as having a full blown eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, Islamic Mandinka Warrior complex, and encourages his young daughter's male house slave friend to harbor thoughts of murder and revenge against their masters. It is mentioned that Kunta's young daughter, Kizzy, is an Atheist.

The entire Plantation white family, except perhaps their young daughter who befriends Kizzy, is portrayed as mean, petty, adulterous, and cruel.

Fiddler was perhaps the only decent character but in the end even he can't forgive those who have trespassed against him.

The whole emphasis and message of this version of the Roots story is not a good one; so far it's all about vengeance and hate for the other and I don't think I'm going to spend much more time watching it.
A few things.
The role of Islam was ambiguous. A lot of times Muslims were go-betweens retailing captured pagan slaves to whites, other times Muslims were sold by other Africans. Almost never did whites venture to the interior to capture slaves.

As for idea that Kunta would not be whipped until he renounced his name because he was "valuable property" -- balderdash. As a fresh from Africa slave it was especially important to break him. Keep in mind also that slaveholders knew just how much punishment they could inflict without doing permanent damage.

As for being set on revenge, I would describe it as keeping alive their dream of freedom. And why would the slaves forgive? The masters certainly don't feel bound by Christian morals and they used Christianity as a weapon of oppression.

As for showing white people as evil, why not? A lot of them were. A lot of them tried to be kindly but were still part of an evil system and they could turn on a dime if they felt offended by a slave, i.e. one who didn't keep up the keep up the pretense of being part of a happy family.
Tom Lea, on the other end of the spectrum was probably not typical but also not unrealistic.

Besides, by my reckoning it would be perfectly moral to for anyone to kill anyone who tried to enslave him. "Live free or die."

A lot of things totally unrealistic:
All the slaves hanging around their cabins during the daytime. Slaves worked sunup to sundown six days a week, sometimes a half-day on Sundays.

Kizzy would not of been allowed to be friends with the white girl past the age of 6-8.

All the shouting and shoving matches between masters or overseers & slaves. No backtalk would be tolerated and no slave who laid hands on a white person would be killed or sold away.

The massacre of black Union soldiers; there were only a couple such incidents during the war although they often were given "no quarter" during the fighting.

I'd like to find "The African" the book Alex Haley plagiarized to write Roots.



Jun 3, '16, 3:58 am
Sarcelle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2012
Posts: 7,470
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by didymus View Post
A few things.
The role of Islam was ambiguous. A lot of times Muslims were go-betweens retailing captured pagan slaves to whites, other times Muslims were sold by other Africans. Almost never did whites venture to the interior to capture slaves.

As for idea that Kunta would not be whipped until he renounced his name because he was "valuable property" -- balderdash. As a fresh from Africa slave it was especially important to break him. Keep in mind also that slaveholders knew just how much punishment they could inflict without doing permanent damage.

As for being set on revenge, I would describe it as keeping alive their dream of freedom. And why would the slaves forgive? The masters certainly don't feel bound by Christian morals and they used Christianity as a weapon of oppression.

As for showing white people as evil, why not? A lot of them were. A lot of them tried to be kindly but were still part of an evil system and they could turn on a dime if they felt offended by a slave, i.e. one who didn't keep up the keep up the pretense of being part of a happy family.
Tom Lea, on the other end of the spectrum was probably not typical but also not unrealistic.

Besides, by my reckoning it would be perfectly moral to for anyone to kill anyone who tried to enslave him. "Live free or die."

A lot of things totally unrealistic:
All the slaves hanging around their cabins during the daytime. Slaves worked sunup to sundown six days a week, sometimes a half-day on Sundays.

Kizzy would not of been allowed to be friends with the white girl past the age of 6-8.

All the shouting and shoving matches between masters or overseers & slaves. No backtalk would be tolerated and no slave who laid hands on a white person would be killed or sold away.

The massacre of black Union soldiers; there were only a couple such incidents during the war although they often were given "no quarter" during the fighting.

I'd like to find "The African" the book Alex Haley plagiarized to write Roots.




True.

Slavery is an evil which still exists today.

No amount of whitewashing will make it moral or good.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Jun 3, '16, 5:22 am
didymus's Avatar
Veteran Member
Radio Club Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2005
Posts: 10,387
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

One thing, I'm curious how they got away with staging the cockfighting scenes what with all the animal rights groups on the lookout.
__________________
It's not hoarding if it's BOOKS.

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Jun 4, '16, 10:57 pm
Forum Elder
Greeter
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 43,768
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
There is a remake of "Roots" coming out. Stories like these make for interesting entertainment, but old wounds never heal when they are constantly picked at. There have been a lot of slavery movies and TV lately. This can't help but to foster more feelings of guilt and resentment and that is not healthy for a society. At some point you have to let go of the 'bad old days' and move on.
I like Snoop Dog's take on this remake and other movies about slavery. I don't have the link but I am sure you can find it. Something like we need to be looking at achievements by African Americans today and not feeling victimized by the past.
__________________
You created every part of me; you put me together in my mother's womb. (13) when I was growing there in secret, you knew that I was there----you saw me before I was born. (15) ~~~Psalm 139
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Jun 13, '16, 6:35 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,043
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
There is a remake of "Roots" coming out. Stories like these make for interesting entertainment, but old wounds never heal when they are constantly picked at. There have been a lot of slavery movies and TV lately. This can't help but to foster more feelings of guilt and resentment and that is not healthy for a society. At some point you have to let go of the 'bad old days' and move on.
So we simply stop talking about history because it might make people feel uncomfortable?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Jun 13, '16, 6:46 pm
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
So we simply stop talking about history because it might make people feel uncomfortable?
There is a fine line between learning history, which appeals to the intellect, and sensationalizing it, which appeals directly to the emotions and encourages hatred and violence. As I recall, the first time Roots was broadcast, there were many instances of gangs of blacks assaulting whites at random while screaming "Roots! Roots!" We already had one Roots. Do we really need another? We have also recently had "Twelve Years a Slave" which was nothing but torture porn in my opinion. The violence depicted in that film wasn't even in the book, it was just added for gratuitous sensationalism. This is way beyond simply learning history.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Jun 13, '16, 6:56 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,043
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
There is a fine line between learning history, which appeals to the intellect, and sensationalizing it, which appeals directly to the emotions and encourages hatred and violence. As I recall, the first time Roots was broadcast, there were many instances of gangs of blacks assaulting whites at random while screaming "Roots! Roots!" We already had one Roots. Do we really need another? We have also recently had "Twelve Years a Slave" which was nothing but torture porn in my opinion. The violence depicted in that film wasn't even in the book, it was just added for gratuitous sensationalism. This is way beyond simply learning history.
This approach dismisses in total the value of fictional accounts of historic events. One might read a history of any period of suffering and oppression. Doing so would certainly provide a factual education. In contrast, however, fiction helps to make meaning of history. The same is true in film.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Jun 14, '16, 1:15 am
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
This approach dismisses in total the value of fictional accounts of historic events. One might read a history of any period of suffering and oppression. Doing so would certainly provide a factual education. In contrast, however, fiction helps to make meaning of history. The same is true in film.
Did "Noah" or "The Last Temptation of Christ" help make meaning of Holy Scripture? History and fiction are not compatible. Sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Jun 14, '16, 7:47 am
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,043
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
Did "Noah" or "The Last Temptation of Christ" help make meaning of Holy Scripture? History and fiction are not compatible. Sorry.
So the entire genre of historical fiction should be eliminated... You're going to have to do away with memoir, too, since it incorporates figurative language. So there goes texts like Elie Wiesel's Night, which by Wiesel's own admission includes partially fictionalized content. Survivors of atrocities clearly shouldn't write and share their own testimonies then. All because, as you've claimed, those not discussed in such texts/films might feel uncomfortable.

Again, meaning isn't created in a historical treatise. Names, dates, and factual accounts don't assist readers in understanding the human quality of events or in placing themselves in another human's shoes. To do away with fictionalized accounts entirely is to place history out of cognitive and emotional reach of all future generations.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Jun 14, '16, 11:47 am
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
So the entire genre of historical fiction should be eliminated... You're going to have to do away with memoir, too, since it incorporates figurative language. So there goes texts like Elie Wiesel's Night, which by Wiesel's own admission includes partially fictionalized content. Survivors of atrocities clearly shouldn't write and share their own testimonies then. All because, as you've claimed, those not discussed in such texts/films might feel uncomfortable.

Again, meaning isn't created in a historical treatise. Names, dates, and factual accounts don't assist readers in understanding the human quality of events or in placing themselves in another human's shoes. To do away with fictionalized accounts entirely is to place history out of cognitive and emotional reach of all future generations.
Go ahead and read fictionalized accounts of historical events if it makes you happy. It doesn't make me happy. I want to know what really happened. Not someone's juiced up version of it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Jun 14, '16, 12:00 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,043
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
Go ahead and read fictionalized accounts of historical events if it makes you happy. It doesn't make me happy. I want to know what really happened. Not someone's juiced up version of it.
Then you'll be educated about events but not why they matter. 'Cause you won't make meaning of those events by reading history books.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old Jun 14, '16, 12:00 pm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 5, 2014
Posts: 222
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
There is a remake of "Roots" coming out. Stories like these make for interesting entertainment, but old wounds never heal when they are constantly picked at. There have been a lot of slavery movies and TV lately. This can't help but to foster more feelings of guilt and resentment and that is not healthy for a society. At some point you have to let go of the 'bad old days' and move on.
Really! So what are you saying? Just forget history, don't teach it or watch movies that depict it? This is the one piece of history (slavery) we should not forget. We must never forget the stain of slavery. You can never loose site or let go of the bad old days. I'm glad this movie is out. The African American experience in this country has never been fully depicted. I say, more, more, more of these kinds of movies.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old Jun 14, '16, 4:29 pm
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by seaton2005 View Post
Really! So what are you saying? Just forget history, don't teach it or watch movies that depict it? This is the one piece of history (slavery) we should not forget. We must never forget the stain of slavery. You can never loose site or let go of the bad old days. I'm glad this movie is out. The African American experience in this country has never been fully depicted. I say, more, more, more of these kinds of movies.
Did I say to just forget history? Did I? No, I did not. I am saying that incessantly sensationalizing an already sensational past only fuels the flames of hatred. Do you really think there is not an undercurrent of hatred in this country? Just read the news! Take a look at this article from "The Root":

Quote:
Hello, white people. Thanks for stopping by and reading!

As many of you may already know, during the Memorial Day holiday, the History Channel began airing a four-part remake of Roots*—the iconic miniseries tracing a black family’s history starting in West Africa, through American chattel slavery and up to the present day. As you can imagine, watching a depiction of the centuries-long capture, enslavement, rape, displacement, torture and murder of our ancestors can be a pretty harrowing and emotional experience for black people. And I can imagine that the fact that this capture, enslavement, rape, displacement, torture and murder was done at the behest of some of your ancestors is probably quite awkward, especially when you’re interacting with your black co-workers the morning after a Roots episode.

With this in mind, I’ve decided to give you a helpful guide on exactly how to do this.

Just don’t. This is the safest bet. Of course, we (black people) are not stupid. While the effects of slavery linger—and probably always will in America—we realize that the events depicted in the story happened hundreds of years ago. We also realize that you don’t own any slaves and that there’s even a chance that none of your ancestors did, either. Again, we know this.

But the morning after we just watched Kunta get his foot chopped off … or whipped into accepting “Toby” as his name … or have his daughter sold away is not the best time to ask us about when we’re going to finish that late TPS report. Or stop past the cubicle to ask about Memorial Day weekend. Or send us a Paperless Post invitation to your family’s annual deep-woods potluck. Or use the word “picnic” in any context.

Because while we are very aware that you personally didn’t do any of what happened, there’s somewhere between a 47 and 92 percent chance that Roots-watching residue might make us hate white people for the next 24 to 144 hours. So it’s in everyone’s best interest if you just keep your distance for a little while. Maybe even use a few of those paid-time-off days and come back to work when we’re not fantasizing about choke-slamming overseers. (And yes, since none of us personally know any overseers, the protagonist in those fantasies may very well be you.)

If you must interact, don’t bring up or reference Roots. Or 12 Years a Slave. Or slavery as an institution. Or racism. Or Clarence Thomas. Or … you get my point.


The black author of this post is admitting that watching "Roots", "12 Years a Slave", "Django Unchained", etc, etc, etc, makes black people hate white people. And he admits the hatred is irrational. He knows white people today are not responsible for slavery, yet that hatred is fanned like pouring gasoline on a fire. There is no learning history going on here with these kinds of movies. There is only fanning the flames of hate and resentment. The scenes he refers to ("we just watched Kunta get his foot chopped off" and "whipped into accepting “Toby” as his name") are works of fiction. Slavery was real. These inflammatory stories are fiction designed not to educate, but for generating ratings and revenue. I do not want anyone to be forced to tiptoe around angry black people because they just got done watching "Django Unchained." Do you?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old Jun 14, '16, 4:31 pm
boomerang's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Posts: 1,908
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
Then you'll be educated about events but not why they matter. 'Cause you won't make meaning of those events by reading history books.
My, aren't we presumptuous?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old Jun 14, '16, 4:42 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,043
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Anybody watch Roots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
My, aren't we presumptuous?
Not at all. Just educated on the different functions of different forms of writing and their different outcomes.
Reply With Quote
__________________
It's not hoarding if it's BOOKS.

No comments:

Post a Comment