Tuesday, August 29, 2017

March for Women

Jan 19, '17, 9:40 am
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Posts: 5,694
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default March for Women

Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.

If this is already in another thread, feel free to move, or whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Jan 19, '17, 9:53 am
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2005
Posts: 1,332
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.
It's the opposite of March for Life...

Kellyanne Conway Uses Her Star Power To Lift The March For Life

She’s a rockstar in politics right now, and that reputation is hard-earned and well- deserved. Conway is using that influence and attention to pull focus to issues the
mainstream media would rather ignore. Conway will be speaking at the March for Life in Washington DC, just a week after Trump is inaugurated, as the first sitting White House official to address the event in person.

William McGurn, an editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, praised her brave support for life Monday. He outlines her longstanding pro-life history and influence on Trump’s proposed policies, and notes that her move to speak at the March for Life steals thunder from the similarly named but ideologically opposite Women’s March on Washington.
...
http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/19/...ft-march-life/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Jan 19, '17, 11:38 am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

http://www.arabamericanny.org/lindasarsour/

The woman in this link is among those that started the march.

A pure New Yorker for sure.

NY NY is rearing an ugly head in ways few people are aware of.

If there was ever a state in the union that needed to divide...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Jan 19, '17, 11:42 am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.

If this is already in another thread, feel free to move, or whatever.
Can't you supply a link to stay afloat here?

Maybe this?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Jan 19, '17, 12:53 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Posts: 5,694
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
Can't you supply a link to stay afloat here?

Maybe this?
I probably could have, but a) that would have required effort, and b) else what a forum for?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Jan 19, '17, 12:58 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/on...ns-march-in-to

Catholic teachers’ union leader endorses pro-abortion Women’s March protesting Trump
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Jan 19, '17, 12:59 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
I probably could have, but a) that would have required effort, and b) else what a forum for?
not about could've should've

but rather must

News forum rules require a news link/story per thread start
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Jan 19, '17, 1:09 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2012
Posts: 3,846
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/on...ns-march-in-to

Catholic teachers’ union leader endorses pro-abortion Women’s March protesting Trump
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.

Quote:
Mission & Vision

We stand together in solidarity with our partners and children for the protection of our rights, our safety, our health, and our families - recognizing that our vibrant and diverse communities are the strength of our country.



OUR MISSION

The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us - immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault - and our communities are hurting and scared. We are confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.

In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.

We support the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities. We call on all defenders of human rights to join us. This march is the first step towards unifying our communities, grounded in new relationships, to create change from the grassroots level up. We will not rest until women have parity and equity at all levels of leadership in society. We work peacefully while recognizing there is no true peace without justice and equity for all.

HEAR OUR VOICE.

Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Jan 19, '17, 1:22 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.




Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
Their mission statement doesn't need to mention abortion or reproductive rights. Their sheer number/presence is all the momentum and inference they think they need to prevent the overturn of Roe v. Wade and continued financial support for reproductive contraception.

One day at time. One moment at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Jan 19, '17, 1:27 pm
Richard White's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2013
Posts: 3,771
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.

Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
Actually, this is inaccurate. Over the last two days, the Women's March has decided to uninvite pro-life feminist groups from attending the March and revoke its partnership with the pro-life feminist group New Wave Feminists, although they will assuredly be attending anyway. In fact, as seen in the first link I attached below, the Women's March states blatantly that it is pro-choice and that the fact that it is pro-choice is located in its "Unity Principles."

From said "Unity Principles:"

Quote:
We believe in Reproductive Freedom. We do not accept any federal, state or local rollbacks, cuts or restrictions on our ability to access quality reproductive healthcare services, birth control, HIV/AIDS care and prevention, or medically accurate sexuality education. This means open access to safe, legal, affordable abortion and birth control for all people, regardless of income, location or education.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/16/pr...-womens-march/

More here:

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01...ro-life-group/

Therefore, these people have no interest in actually partnering in solidarity with their fellow women, regardless of their views on abortion, to make their voices heard, but merely want to stay in their "safe space" and shout as loud as possible. Give me a break...

May God bless you all!
__________________
"And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age" (Matthew 28:20).

Christ is Risen! Alleluia! Alleluia!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Jan 19, '17, 1:54 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2012
Posts: 3,846
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard White View Post
Actually, this is inaccurate. Over the last two days, the Women's March has decided to uninvite pro-life feminist groups from attending the March and revoke its partnership with the pro-life feminist group New Wave Feminists, although they will assuredly be attending anyway. In fact, as seen in the first link I attached below, the Women's March states blatantly that it is pro-choice and that the fact that it is pro-choice is located in its "Unity Principles."

From said "Unity Principles:"



http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/16/pr...-womens-march/

More here:

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01...ro-life-group/

Therefore, these people have no interest in actually partnering in solidarity with their fellow women, regardless of their views on abortion, to make their voices heard, but merely want to stay in their "safe space" and shout as loud as possible. Give me a break...

May God bless you all!
I stand corrected. Thank you.

That's extremely disappointing. I was under the impression the march was for all women. I guess everybody's got their sacred cow. It really does stink being a pro-life progressive, nobody likes us.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Jan 19, '17, 3:25 pm
phil19034's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2013
Posts: 6,808
Religion: Catholic - Roman Rite
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.




Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
No. The pro-life groups were just kicked out. New Wave Feminists were just kicked out as a "partner" this week because they are pro life feminists. The Susan B. Anthony List was also not allowed to be a partner because they are pro life.

check out this article from today from Lila Rose's non-profit group http://liveactionnews.org/womens-mar...list-partners/

The website for the Women's march is fill with several press releases that outline their anti-Trump purpose.

https://www.womensmarch.com/press/

Their honorary co-chairs are deep pro-abortion people:
Angie Davis
Dolores Huerta
Gloria Steinem
Harry Belafonte
and LaDonna Harris

https://www.womensmarch.com/honorary-cochairs/

One of their 2 "premier partners" is Planned Parenthood.

But at the same time they dropped New Wave Feminists for being pro-life, they just added a pro-life clinic that wants to replace planned parenthood

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/br...ro-life-clinic

Also, read the Washington Post's article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...=.578e2b83435e

Point is, while some pro-life groups are going to be there, pro-life groups are not welcome to partner with them.

Also, their new Unity Principles go against Catholic teaching.
https://www.womensmarch.com/principles/
__________________
I often post from my iPhone, so please forgive typos


Visit Lighthouse Catholic Media
Join CD/MP3 of the Month Club
Are you in ministry & want a professional email address? Visit parishconsultants.org
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Jan 19, '17, 3:35 pm
phil19034's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2013
Posts: 6,808
Religion: Catholic - Roman Rite
Default Re: March for Women

Maybe we should also have a Men's March in DC?

A march dedicated to men being real men. Similar to a Men's Catholic conference, focused on authentic masculinity: i.e. honor, respect, fatherhood, chivalry, etc.
__________________
I often post from my iPhone, so please forgive typos


Visit Lighthouse Catholic Media
Join CD/MP3 of the Month Club
Are you in ministry & want a professional email address? Visit parishconsultants.org
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Jan 19, '17, 4:37 pm
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Posts: 21,525
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.




Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
Women's March have released a statement which is reported on below:

Quote:
“The Women’s March’s platform is pro-choice and that has been our stance from day one,” the organizers said in a statement. “The anti-choice organization in question is not a partner of the Women’s March on Washington. We apologize for this error.”
http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/18/...ro-life-women/

The march officially has taken a pro-choice stance. There will be some pro life people attending, but the stance is clear of the March and the seeming overarching agenda.

It states at the following:

Quote:
Planned Parenthood has just become an official partner of the march and will assist leaders in providing staff and large-scale event planning knowledge.
Quote:
Planned Parenthood has helped shape the march’s policy agenda, and in return, it hopes that many of the protesters will mobilize in its defense when Trump and congressional Republicans make their attempt to strip the organization of millions in federal funding.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ngton-dc-guide
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Jan 19, '17, 4:39 pm
Sarcelle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2012
Posts: 7,500
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil19034 View Post
Maybe we should also have a Men's March in DC?

A march dedicated to men being real men. Similar to a Men's Catholic conference, focused on authentic masculinity: i.e. honor, respect, fatherhood, chivalry, etc.
Yes. There should be a Men's march dedicated to authentic masculinity.

A lot better than the women's march which has an evil like abortion enshrined as a feminist sacrament. Sickening. 
 
 
Jan 19, '17, 4:42 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2011
Posts: 881
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil19034 View Post
Maybe we should also have a Men's March in DC?

A march dedicated to men being real men. Similar to a Men's Catholic conference, focused on authentic masculinity: i.e. honor, respect, fatherhood, chivalry, etc.
Men don't need anything man-specific else in this world, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Jan 19, '17, 4:44 pm
Sarcelle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2012
Posts: 7,500
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshman1 View Post
Men don't need anything man-specific else in this world, lol.
Why?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Jan 19, '17, 4:45 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2011
Posts: 881
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarcelle View Post
Why?
Because our culture is so male dominated as it is.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Jan 19, '17, 4:56 pm
Robert Bay's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 26, 2005
Posts: 32,573
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

MODERATOR NOTICE

All posts are to be charitable and follow forum guidelines, including use of language.
__________________
Robert Bay, Moderator





Never let evil talk pass your lips; say only the good things men need to hear, things that will really help them. (Ephesians 4:29)

Moderator direction can be appealed by sending an email to: forumadmin@catholic.com
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Jan 19, '17, 5:10 pm
phil19034's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2013
Posts: 6,808
Religion: Catholic - Roman Rite
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshman1 View Post
Men don't need anything man-specific else in this world, lol.
I beg to differ. Have you ever been to a Catholic Men's conference? If you haven't, I highly recommend one.

Men need to learn how to be real men again.

Pornography, "dead-beat dads," etc. plus even the radical feminist movement have all warped authentic masculinity.

Men need to be reminded how to properly take care of the wives and children. Men need to be reminded or taught how to be good fathers and role models. Men need to learn how to not objectify & abuse women, etc.

There are lots of things that a Man's March can accomplish to help make sure children have active fathers, and that number of fatherless homes diminishes.

God Bless
__________________
I often post from my iPhone, so please forgive typos


Visit Lighthouse Catholic Media
Join CD/MP3 of the Month Club
Are you in ministry & want a professional email address? Visit parishconsultants.org
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Jan 19, '17, 5:38 pm
phil19034's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2013
Posts: 6,808
Religion: Catholic - Roman Rite
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshman1 View Post
Because our culture is so male dominated as it is.
If you look at the Generation X & Millennials, I don't think our culture is really male dominated anymore. The number of women attending college out numbers the number of men. The number of female lawyers & doctors continue to increase.

At my law firm, the majority of associates are women. The majority of partners is most likely still men, but that's because it will take a while for the millennial generation and the generations that come after the millennials to replace the Baby Boomers.

The majority of families with children today are two income households and it's not uncommon for a wife to be the breadwinner today.

In regards to the pay gap, when you look at today's starting salaries, the pay gap is practically non-existent. Many companies are starting to have set starting salaries instead of having a large starting range. And when a company does have a range, more women today are negotiating better starting salaries instead of settling for the original offer.

Some studies have shown that the main reason there is a pay gap in average pay is because there are many women who take significant time off to have children. For example, my wife (a teacher) has taken 5 years off from work so far. When she eventually goes back to work, her salary will not be what it would have been if she didn't take several years off. Addtionally, there are several associates (like at my firm) who select lower pay and a lower annual billing requirement so they can spend more time at home. And some, places of employment allow a mother (not a father) to take up to a one year unpaid sabbatical after their paid leave is gone after childbirth.

I strongly believe that as companies switch maternity leave to paternity leave, we will see the gap start to close a lot more. That way, if a mother is the breadwinner and a family wants one parent to take a year off from work, the father could do it. However, even with this, I do think that if one parent is going to take significant time off from work, most mothers are going to want to be the one who does it (unless the mother makes significantly more money than the father).

My point is, this is not the 20th century anymore. Women have far more power today in today's society than they did even 20 years ago. Look, how close we came to having a female President and BOTH parties had serious female Presidential candidates.

My daughter is 5 years old and I have no doubt that she will be able to do whatever she sets her mind to doing. The fact that she's a girl will not hinder her at all. However, I don't feel the same way about my 2 year old son. I fear that an identity crisis among young men is growing. Today, as a manager, when dealing with kids fresh out of college, I see far more better female candidates than male candidates. A lot of the young men I see in the legal field today are lacking the confidence and social skills that their female counterparts have. It's a vast difference compared to law school classes a decade ago.

God Bless
__________________
I often post from my iPhone, so please forgive typos


Visit Lighthouse Catholic Media
Join CD/MP3 of the Month Club
Are you in ministry & want a professional email address? Visit parishconsultants.org
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Jan 19, '17, 6:41 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2015
Posts: 2,522
Religion: Anglican
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
The March isn't pro-abortion, it's pro-women rights. There are pro-life groups marching (secular groups anyway). There are plenty of pro-choice groups going but that's not the point of the March in general. Everybody there may have different views, the one thing they have in common is they are women or for women. There is no mention of abortion or even reproductive rights in the mission statement.

Take a look at the Guiding Principles as well.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/
It is quite global now. 600 marches across 57 countries. And you are correct, it is not about reproductive rights. It is about human rights and equality - and dignity.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/201...bal-day-action
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Jan 19, '17, 6:46 pm
Forum Master
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 13,707
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
It is quite global now. 600 marches across 57 countries. And you are correct, it is not about reproductive rights. It is about human rights and equality - and dignity.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/201...bal-day-action
When unborn babies (just over 50% of whom are women) have human rights, equality, and dignity, that will be a real occasion for marching.
__________________
HLS Club

I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful" (Ordinatio Sacerdotalis 4). Pope John Paul II.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Jan 19, '17, 6:54 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Posts: 5,694
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
not about could've should've

but rather must

News forum rules require a news link/story per thread start
oops
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Jan 19, '17, 7:11 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Posts: 3,586
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
It is quite global now. 600 marches across 57 countries. And you are correct, it is not about reproductive rights. It is about human rights and equality - and dignity.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/201...bal-day-action
Nope, the earlier poster you quoted, and agreed with, has already corrected their position. The organizers of the March specifically reject any partners, no matter how committed to women's rights, who are also prolife.
That is the sacred cause. They will not bend on that, they will not compromise on that, though they will bend, or compromise on any other women's issue.

If Donald Trump took a prochoice position in the campaign, and everything else he said was the same...and Hilary took a prolife position, every other position same as what she actually supported...the media would have supported Trump.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old Jan 19, '17, 7:21 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Posts: 3,586
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
I stand corrected. Thank you.

That's extremely disappointing. I was under the impression the march was for all women. I guess everybody's got their sacred cow. It really does stink being a pro-life progressive, nobody likes us.
Hey, I like you.

As a former Democrat, as a social worker for over 40 years, who still volunteers in the inner city, as someone who held his nose while he voted for Trump, I think I can see your POV.

“Progress should mean that we are always changing the world to fit the vision, instead we are always changing the vision.” G. K. Chesterton

Chesterton wrote many times about progress, and progressives. Look him up. I know he has been claimed by some conservatives as a champion, but he does not really fit into that category, nor does he fit into the usual socialism vs capitalism categories. He also wrote a great deal about progress and the family, and about contraception and foresaw legal abortion.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old Jan 19, '17, 8:22 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2015
Posts: 1,375
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.

If this is already in another thread, feel free to move, or whatever.
Wish I could go. Would love to bring my pro-life generation banner.

Ah well.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old Jan 19, '17, 9:38 pm
Dwyer's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Byzantine Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

I bet you there will be a lot of coverage of the March for Women on all the Cable Network News channels this Saturday, and almost wall to wall coverage of that event on CNN and MSNBC but when the March for Life 2017 occurs on January 27th, we will be lucky if Fox News runs a two minute news segment about it.
__________________


"It's a free country; you can say whatever you want."

--Old American Saying

(U.S. Postal Service stamp-- from 1977 Americana series which extols freedom of speech and features a Speaker's Stand decorated with an American Flag shield.)
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old Jan 20, '17, 12:45 am
DaddyGirl's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Posts: 8,635
Religion: may the force be with you
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caldera View Post
She’s a rockstar in politics right now, and that reputation is hard-earned and well- deserved.
Kellyanne a "rock star"?
To whom?
People intensely dislike her.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
http://www.arabamericanny.org/lindasarsour/
NY NY is rearing an ugly head in ways few people are aware of.
If there was ever a state in the union that needed to divide...
What do you mean?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
It is quite global now. 600 marches across 57 countries. And you are correct, it is not about reproductive rights. It is about human rights and equality - and dignity.
Exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter View Post
If Donald Trump took a prochoice position in the campaign, and everything else he said was the same...and Hilary took a prolife position, every other position same as what she actually supported...the media would have supported Trump.
Um, no.
First of all, there's plenty of media...including The New York Post, by the way, who support and supported and publicly endorsed Trump.

Second...the media who didn't support Trump didn't do so because he implied he was against abortion.
They did it because he has no experience, he makes ill-informed, rash, impetuous, spiteful statements and decisions, he's a bully to anyone he doesn't like or who disagrees with him, he did not reveal his taxes, he gave little indication of policies during the campaign, he treats women without respect, he skips out paying hard-working people, he's a dangerous narcissist, he's racist, he's a habitual liar, he's going to leave millions without healthcare, he's suspected of having unethical ties with Russia, he offends and insults patriots, and he'll probably throw us into a world war because of a temper tantrum.

The only positive thing I can say about him is that he supports same-sex marriage--at least there's that.

.
__________________

Creator and member of The Rational Rat Pack:

"Wherever you go, there you are."
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old Jan 20, '17, 1:19 am
Miss_Felicity's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2013
Posts: 568
Religion: Christ Follower
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl View Post
Kellyanne a "rock star"?
To whom?
People intensely dislike her.




What do you mean?



Exactly.



Um, no.
First of all, there's plenty of media...including The New York Post, by the way, who support and supported and publicly endorsed Trump.

Second...the media who didn't support Trump didn't do so because he implied he was against abortion.
They did it because he has no experience, he makes ill-informed, rash, impetuous, spiteful statements and decisions, he's a bully to anyone he doesn't like or who disagrees with him, he did not reveal his taxes, he gave little indication of policies during the campaign, he treats women without respect, he skips out paying hard-working people, he's a dangerous narcissist, he's racist, he's a habitual liar, he's going to leave millions without healthcare, he's suspected of having unethical ties with Russia, he offends and insults patriots, and he'll probably throw us into a world war because of a temper tantrum.

The only positive thing I can say about him is that he supports same-sex marriage--at least there's that.

.
Nail on head  
 
 
Jan 20, '17, 5:23 am
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl View Post
Kellyanne a "rock star"?
To whom?
People intensely dislike her.



.
Some consider Obama a "rock star", some intensely disliked him. Different strokes.
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old Jan 20, '17, 6:31 am
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 1,635
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.

If this is already in another thread, feel free to move, or whatever.
I have been considering it, but I don't feel comfortable fighting the crowds and packed metro by myself with a stroller and baby girl is too heavy to wear while walking for so long. DH is not one for this sort of thing and even if he was, his job precludes public political activism.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old Jan 20, '17, 6:37 am
TCEL's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2014
Posts: 2,440
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwyer View Post
I bet you there will be a lot of coverage of the March for Women on all the Cable Network News channels this Saturday, and almost wall to wall coverage of that event on CNN and MSNBC but when the March for Life 2017 occurs on January 27th, we will be lucky if Fox News runs a two minute news segment about it.
On the other hand, it allows us to keep making headway under the radar. Sometimes the ignoring strategy is a two-edged sword. I don't understand the strategy myself. If I were pro-choice, I would rather cast flood-lights on the March for Life in order to motivate the base.
__________________
From Jewish Passover to Christian Eucharist: the Story of the Todah
“If men will not be governed by the Ten Commandments, they shall be governed by the ten thousand commandments.” ― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old Jan 20, '17, 8:43 am
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2012
Posts: 3,846
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter View Post
Nope, the earlier poster you quoted, and agreed with, has already corrected their position. The organizers of the March specifically reject any partners, no matter how committed to women's rights, who are also prolife.
That is the sacred cause. They will not bend on that, they will not compromise on that, though they will bend, or compromise on any other women's issue.

If Donald Trump took a prochoice position in the campaign, and everything else he said was the same...and Hilary took a prolife position, every other position same as what she actually supported...the media would have supported Trump.
Yeah, that was me. I haven't seen anything else come out that contradicts yesterday's news.

I talked to my wife about it a bit and she tended to agree a bit although she isn't against the march (I'd consider her a moderate feminist, more old school than new). In fact she was reading an article from a minorities woman's point of view and the author felt that minorities weren't well represented either. I didn't read that article so I don't know the details. I think the gist of it was that the organizers are treating woman as a monolith that all think alike.

I am for women's rights but those rights end when they infringe on another persons rights. I think the pro-life groups will go anyway. Some of these young girls are tough, they aren't going to stay away just because someone told them to.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old Jan 21, '17, 7:46 am
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2016
Posts: 1,585
Religion: ?
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter View Post
Nope, the earlier poster you quoted, and agreed with, has already corrected their position. The organizers of the March specifically reject any partners, no matter how committed to women's rights, who are also prolife.
That is the sacred cause. They will not bend on that, they will not compromise on that, though they will bend, or compromise on any other women's issue.

If Donald Trump took a prochoice position in the campaign, and everything else he said was the same...and Hilary took a prolife position, every other position same as what she actually supported...the media would have supported Trump.
!!!!!!!

You have articulated what I wanted to say perfectly.

Society did a terrific job in acting like they care about all women. It's scary, really.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old Jan 21, '17, 7:53 am
gilliam's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: June 11, 2004
Posts: 37,957
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Women’s March raises more questions than answers

Media coverage of the Jan. 21 Women's March on Washington will frame it as an expression of a "women's agenda," but Professor Helen Alvare claims the reality is that some of the ideas it's likely to express are good, some are vague, and some are just plain terrible.

https://cruxnow.com/commentary/2017/...tions-answers/
__________________
-gilliam
Catholicism is not the religious version of a political ideology
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old Jan 21, '17, 8:14 am
starshiptrooper's Avatar  
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Posts: 1,744
Religion: Troubled Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil19034 View Post
I beg to differ. Have you ever been to a Catholic Men's conference? If you haven't, I highly recommend one.

Men need to learn how to be real men again.
Real men do not care about what people like you think a man has to do to qualify as a "real man".
Quote:
Pornography, "dead-beat dads," etc. plus even the radical feminist movement have all warped authentic masculinity.

Men need to be reminded how to properly take care of the wives and children. Men need to be reminded or taught how to be good fathers and role models. Men need to learn how to not objectify & abuse women, etc.

There are lots of things that a Man's March can accomplish to help make sure children have active fathers, and that number of fatherless homes diminishes.

God Bless
So basically the purpose is to remind men just how oppressive and terrible they are and to teach them to better serve women.

That does not address any of the issues men face today.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old Jan 21, '17, 8:58 am
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2004
Posts: 10,381
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by starshiptrooper View Post
Real men do not care about what people like you think a man has to do to qualify as a "real man".So basically the purpose is to remind men just how oppressive and terrible they are and to teach them to better serve women.

That does not address any of the issues men face today.
Funny.
I didn't read any of it that way.
__________________
duly deposited.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Jan 21, '17, 9:03 am
Mary Gail 36's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: September 5, 2005
Posts: 17,452
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by vz71 View Post
Funny.
I didn't read any of it that way.
I actually though Phil has a great concept for a men's march. And I did get the idea that men's rights types might not agree. I seemed to be right.
__________________
Jesus, protect and save the unborn.

The Word became flesh, He lived among us, and we saw His glory, the glory that He has from the Father as only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old Jan 21, '17, 9:56 am
starshiptrooper's Avatar  
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Posts: 1,744
Religion: Troubled Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Gail 36 View Post
I actually though Phil has a great concept for a men's march. And I did get the idea that men's rights types might not agree. I seemed to be right.
Of course the battle lines would be self-evident. Those actually interested in helping men have no interest in being berated for not doing enough for women. So instead of pointing out the obvious, how about discussing the issues?
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old Jan 21, '17, 11:41 am
Mary Gail 36's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: September 5, 2005
Posts: 17,452
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by starshiptrooper View Post
Of course the battle lines would be self-evident. Those actually interested in helping men have no interest in being berated for not doing enough for women. So instead of pointing out the obvious, how about discussing the issues?
He mentioned being against porn. Isn't that a good thing?
__________________
Jesus, protect and save the unborn.

The Word became flesh, He lived among us, and we saw His glory, the glory that He has from the Father as only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old Jan 21, '17, 11:56 am
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2008
Posts: 9,846
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Some of the things said and done at the march are disgusting. Be aware that the following article has some rough language.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...est-Trump.html
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old Jan 21, '17, 11:56 am
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Lovely, lovely stuff

Quote:
Ashley Judd lowers the tone at star-studded DC women's march by reading poem claiming Trump has 'wet dreams' about Ivanka 'his favorite sex symbol' and comparing him to HITLER
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...est-Trump.html
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old Jan 21, '17, 11:58 am
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2008
Posts: 9,846
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
I just posted that link seconds before you.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old Jan 21, '17, 12:00 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishpatrick View Post
I just posted that link seconds before you.
Oops!
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
 
 
Jan 21, '17, 12:02 pm
Forum Master
 
Join Date: August 13, 2013
Posts: 12,205
Religion: Still Catholic......
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?

I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.

It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.

If this is already in another thread, feel free to move, or whatever.
Here. The women's march and the pro life march overlapped. The women's march was incredibly pro choice and vulgar and outnumbered the life march by about six times.

It's sad.

And it's also why I think the time for marching for life has passed.
Nothing changes
__________________
--- Better to be slapped with the Truth than kissed with a lie--------- Russian Proverb

Hey, Visit my wife's site and buy yourself some spiffy T shirts!
http://www.catholic-threads.com/
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old Jan 21, '17, 12:16 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdjebS2toK0

There's this gem from Madonna
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old Jan 21, '17, 12:36 pm
Mary Gail 36's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: September 5, 2005
Posts: 17,452
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
Here. The women's march and the pro life march overlapped. The women's march was incredibly pro choice and vulgar and outnumbered the life march by about six times.

It's sad.

And it's also why I think the time for marching for life has passed.
Nothing changes
The March for Life is on the 27th!

http://marchforlife.org/
__________________
Jesus, protect and save the unborn.

The Word became flesh, He lived among us, and we saw His glory, the glory that He has from the Father as only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:02 pm
Forum Elder
Greeter
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 43,903
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

So is this march for women's rights or is it anti-Trump? I have heard both reasons for the event.
__________________
You created every part of me; you put me together in my mother's womb. (13) when I was growing there in secret, you knew that I was there----you saw me before I was born. (15) ~~~Psalm 139
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:03 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Posts: 2,339
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

HOW MANY WOMEN at these marches support the sex trafficking of young girls? Hillary stood by Bill's 26 flights aboard Jeffrey "the trafficking" Epstein's private plane, the Lolita Express, flying with underaged girls on board, where there are no laws at 35,000 feet over international waters in an attempt to become President. Do you support her ignorance of principle for her own potential political gain? The mainstream media hides the dirty deeds of their faves.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-multiple-lo/
__________________
Before making up your mind, consider the true motivations of the source.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:03 pm
Forum Master
 
Join Date: August 13, 2013
Posts: 12,205
Religion: Still Catholic......
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Gail 36 View Post
The March for Life is on the 27th!

http://marchforlife.org/
In my city it's today
__________________
--- Better to be slapped with the Truth than kissed with a lie--------- Russian Proverb

Hey, Visit my wife's site and buy yourself some spiffy T shirts!
http://www.catholic-threads.com/
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:04 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 1,635
Default Re: March for Women

Yeah I'm pretty glad I didn't go. Apparently the streets are full it's hard to move, and the stuff people are saying is pretty vulgar and crass. I think we can do better than lowering ourselves to the level of Trump's Twitter account.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:21 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by AClaire11 View Post
Yeah I'm pretty glad I didn't go. Apparently the streets are full it's hard to move, and the stuff people are saying is pretty vulgar and crass. I think we can do better than lowering ourselves to the level of Trump's Twitter account.
If you follow any of these celebrities, it's clear that they were at this level long before Trump's twitter blew up.
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:28 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2015
Posts: 2,522
Religion: Anglican
Default Re: March for Women

Millions of women and friends of women. Have you seen the pictures from all over the world? City after city - cramming the streets in support of the rights and dignity of women. Some places - like DC, NYC, Chicago - the crowds cannot move to march to the key events. They just gather, more and more, filling the streets.

It gives one hope, as we see a sea of pink hats, that human rights and respect will prevail. I really do think that the women will not let this 'carnage' come to fruition. So grateful for those who march today.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:32 pm
gilliam's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: June 11, 2004
Posts: 37,957
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
It gives one hope, as we see a sea of pink hats, that human rights and respect will prevail. I really do think that the women will not let this 'carnage' come to fruition. So grateful for those who march today.
The carnage has already occurred and as far as abortion is concerned, is continuing. But that doesn't seem to concern a lot of people on the march.

On the flip side, it wouldn't do Trump any harm to reach out to the organizers of the march to see what common ground there is.
__________________
-gilliam
Catholicism is not the religious version of a political ideology
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:45 pm
Forum Master
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 13,707
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
In my city it's today
Same in my old stomping grounds. The march for life took place at 10 a.m., and the women's march at 1 p.m. (the latter with a lot of pink hats. And fond as I am of knitting, and of pink, and of kitties--I refuse to use the term which has become co-opted as a vulgar epithet--this is one hat that I will never knit, or wear. )
__________________
HLS Club

I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful" (Ordinatio Sacerdotalis 4). Pope John Paul II.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old Jan 21, '17, 1:48 pm
Forum Master
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 13,707
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
Millions of women and friends of women. Have you seen the pictures from all over the world? City after city - cramming the streets in support of the rights and dignity of women. Some places - like DC, NYC, Chicago - the crowds cannot move to march to the key events. They just gather, more and more, filling the streets.

It gives one hope, as we see a sea of pink hats, that human rights and respect will prevail. I really do think that the women will not let this 'carnage' come to fruition. So grateful for those who march today.
Just over 50% of aborted babies are female, and in many areas of the world where abortion for 'selection' is possible the carnage is closer to 90%.

As I have said, I'll be grateful when women stand up for the babies in the wombs as well as all the other people seen as in danger.
__________________
HLS Club

I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful" (Ordinatio Sacerdotalis 4). Pope John Paul II.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:04 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2015
Posts: 2,522
Religion: Anglican
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantum ergo View Post
Just over 50% of aborted babies are female, and in many areas of the world where abortion for 'selection' is possible the carnage is closer to 90%.

As I have said, I'll be grateful when women stand up for the babies in the wombs as well as all the other people seen as in danger.
Many are.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:09 pm
Veteran Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Posts: 10,620
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
Millions of women and friends of women. Have you seen the pictures from all over the world? City after city - cramming the streets in support of the rights and dignity of women. Some places - like DC, NYC, Chicago - the crowds cannot move to march to the key events. They just gather, more and more, filling the streets.

It gives one hope, as we see a sea of pink hats, that human rights and respect will prevail. I really do think that the women will not let this 'carnage' come to fruition. So grateful for those who march today.
I can't figure out what they hope to accomplish. I don't think what they are doing is going to make any difference. Better they do something constructive with their times rather than parading around in pink hats.
__________________
Praying for all CAF intentions.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:11 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
Millions of women and friends of women. Have you seen the pictures from all over the world? City after city - cramming the streets in support of the rights and dignity of women. Some places - like DC, NYC, Chicago - the crowds cannot move to march to the key events. They just gather, more and more, filling the streets.

It gives one hope, as we see a sea of pink hats, that human rights and respect will prevail. I really do think that the women will not let this 'carnage' come to fruition. So grateful for those who march today.
What rights are Trump depriving from women?
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
Jan 21, '17, 2:13 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

I have loads of friends who are marching around the country. My Facebook feed is crammed full of their posts. Two of them are a married lesbian couple who've fostered and adopted two young boys. They're marching because they're terrified that LGBT rights will be rolled back. Other women friends are marching because they fear that Trump's election has normalized sexual assault of women. Some support PP and are marching against its being defunded. I don't agree with all of these women and I've long since given up trying to explain to some women why being pro-life is being pro-woman. But I respect them for marching so long as they're peaceful.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:14 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by mary bobo View Post
I can't figure out what they hope to accomplish. I don't think what they are doing is going to make any difference. Better they do something constructive with their times rather than parading around in pink hats.
It seems if one raises a ruckus and gathers enough people, that's considered "success".

It's quite laughable that they masquerade in utero murder as "reproductive justice" and "women's health". And yet people fall for it.

At what point did people forget to recognize reality and go for saccharine slogans and latest social fads?
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:16 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by mary bobo View Post
I can't figure out what they hope to accomplish. I don't think what they are doing is going to make any difference. Better they do something constructive with their times rather than parading around in pink hats.
But couldn't one make the same argument about the March for Life?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:17 pm
gilliam's Avatar
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: June 11, 2004
Posts: 37,957
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
I have loads of friends who are marching around the country. My Facebook feed is crammed full of their posts. Two of them are a married lesbian couple who've fostered and adopted two young boys. They're marching because they're terrified that LGBT rights will be rolled back.
I'm not sure why they think that. Trump hasn't indicated any interest in doing so. His interests lay elsewhere. Do they think that because he ran as a Republican?

Quote:
Other women friends are marching because they fear that Trump's election has normalized sexual assault of women.
This is silly, thank you liberal media for promoting a red herring.

Quote:
Some support PP and are marching against its being defunded.
PP supporters should probably be worried. The government shouldn't be supporting abortion and that funding will probably go.
__________________
-gilliam
Catholicism is not the religious version of a political ideology
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:22 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gilliam View Post
I'm not sure why they think that. Trump hasn't indicated any interest in doing so. His interests lay elsewhere. Do they think that because he ran as a Republican?
No, they think that because he made Pence his VP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gilliam View Post
This is silly, thank you liberal media for promoting a red herring.
I don't think it's silly or a red herring, though I think women should have noticed in many other politicians a willingness to justify sexual assault before now.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:52 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2015
Posts: 2,522
Religion: Anglican
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by mary bobo View Post
I can't figure out what they hope to accomplish. I don't think what they are doing is going to make any difference. Better they do something constructive with their times rather than parading around in pink hats.
I disagree. Marching, exercising the right to free speech, to gather peacefully, to speak up for wrongs that need to be righted is a time honorable tradition, and we certainly note them in our history.

I know people who marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. His speech at the Lincoln Memorial is considered one of America's finest. And it changed history.

Women Suffragists who marched on Washington after the Inauguration of Woodrow Wilson brought the right for women to vote.

In 1989, in China, the Tiananmen Square protests became a part of history. Those who were martyred are still in our memory.

Our voices and presence makes a difference. Please don't ever deny anyone the right to protest where we see wrong. Or denigrate those who do.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old Jan 21, '17, 2:57 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
I disagree. Marching, exercising the right to free speech, to gather peacefully, to speak up for wrongs that need to be righted is a time honorable tradition, and we certainly note them in our history.

I know people who marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. His speech at the Lincoln Memorial is considered one of America's finest. And it changed history.

Women Suffragists who marched on Washington after the Inauguration of Woodrow Wilson brought the right for women to vote.

In 1989, in China, the Tiananmen Square protests became a part of history. Those who were martyred are still in our memory.

Our voices and presence makes a difference. Please don't ever deny anyone the right to protest where we see wrong. Or denigrate those who do.
But what exactly are they marching *for*? Abortion rights?

The pop artist Madonna said she thought about blowing up the White House, and the crowd cheered. Ashley Judd ranted something obscene about Trump's daughter. The pink hats are euphemisms for vulgarity.

The difference between the marches you mention above and this disaster is that the purpose of this women's pro-death march is to throw a temper tantrum because Hillary lost.

The crowd is protesting *something* apparently.

Which is what exactly?
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:02 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by EIF5A View Post
The pink hats are euphemisms for vulgarity.
You mean the same vulgarity that Trump used?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:07 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
You mean the same vulgarity that Trump used?
He did use that term. No one is squeaky, and he doesn't advocate for violence against women, a manufactured excuse to hate.

But why "celebrate" vulgarity out in the open?

If the leftists had truth and reason on their side, they wouldn't have to resort to cheap tactics to get heard.

What are they marching *for*? Does anyone know? Other than PP defunding, what are they fearful of?
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:10 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantum ergo View Post
Same in my old stomping grounds. The march for life took place at 10 a.m., and the women's march at 1 p.m. (the latter with a lot of pink hats. And fond as I am of knitting, and of pink, and of kitties--I refuse to use the term which has become co-opted as a vulgar epithet--this is one hat that I will never knit, or wear. )
. I knit, although I like crocheting more. I have a cat, Peaches. I hate that term and have for decades, it was considered vulgar before I was born. The British comedy show, Are You Being Served? used it in a running gag that always made me cringe.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:18 pm
Forum Master
 
Join Date: August 13, 2013
Posts: 12,205
Religion: Still Catholic......
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
You mean the same vulgarity that Trump used?
You mean in private?

I say a lot of things in private that I wouldn't put on a hat or shirt.
__________________
--- Better to be slapped with the Truth than kissed with a lie--------- Russian Proverb

Hey, Visit my wife's site and buy yourself some spiffy T shirts!
http://www.catholic-threads.com/
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:21 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by EIF5A View Post
He did use that term. No one is squeaky, and he doesn't advocate for violence against women, a manufactured excuse to hate.

But why "celebrate" vulgarity out in the open?

If the leftists had truth and reason on their side, they wouldn't have to resort to cheap tactics to get heard.

What are they marching *for*? Does anyone know? Other than PP defunding, what are they fearful of?
Vulgarity and all manner of rudeness is apparently part and parcel of being politically incorrect, something to be proud of. If you tell me a word is offensive, all the more reason to use it rather than give into the word/thought police. It is as if we've become a nation of 5 year-olds who get a kick out of using naughty words.

Note that I see evidence of this on all sides of any issue. Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Independents, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, etc. Here on CAF, although somewhat muted (THANK YOU MODERATORS), on prime time TV, on cable (especially on cable).
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:28 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
You mean in private?

I say a lot of things in private that I wouldn't put on a hat or shirt.
Unfortunately, private no longer means what it used to (if it ever did). And as my mother once told me, if you would be ashamed to have your gg-grandparents or your gg-grandchildren, the pope, or someone else read it on the front page, or you wouldn't say it in front of a tape recorder (aka a 3 year-old) perhaps you should re-think saying or writing it. It's probably why I never kept a diary
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:28 pm
starshiptrooper's Avatar  
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Posts: 1,744
Religion: Troubled Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Gail 36 View Post
He mentioned being against porn. Isn't that a good thing?
Porn has deleterious effects on men. The only reason the issue gets any attention is because it supposedly objectifies women or some such Feminist malarkey.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:32 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by starshiptrooper View Post
Porn has deleterious effects on men. The only reason the issue gets any attention is because it supposedly objectifies women or some such Feminist malarkey.
So if it weren't for the deleterious effect on men, you'd be okay with pornography?
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
Jan 21, '17, 3:34 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2005
Posts: 1,294
Religion: Lutheran
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
If you follow any of these celebrities, it's clear that they were at this level long before Trump's twitter blew up.


My own 2cents this march lost all credibility for me when The New Wave feminists and other pro-life groups were disinvited.
Why?
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:36 pm
Estevao's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Posts: 1,404
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

What amazes me is how liberals now constantly talk about how afraid they supposedly are. I seem to remember one of their idols say "we have nothing to fear but fear itself" but it seems the left no longer believes in that.
__________________
Jesus, I trust in You!

Join the Chastity Support Group:
http://forums.catholic.com/group.php?groupid=1916
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:38 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanny View Post


My own 2cents this march lost all credibility for me when The New Wave feminists and other pro-life groups were disinvited.
Why?
While I wish they had not been dis-invited, perhaps it was an effort to protect them. Which also annoys me that people with differing opinions in some areas can't work together in others.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:39 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Posts: 8,098
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

To comment would be as unnecessary as would be pointless. All one needs to do is to look at the long list of participating organizations https://www.womensmarch.com/partners/.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:43 pm
josh987654321's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 5,266
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
Just curious--is anyone participating?
I hope not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
I'm not entirely sure what it's main purpose is.
Abortion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by on_the_hill View Post
It doesn't seem like it would be particularly Catholic-friendly.
I agree.

I hope this has helped

God Bless

Thank you for reading
Josh
__________________
Jesus to St Faustina
You please Me most when you meditate on My Sorrowful Passion.
(Diary, 1512)
The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there.
(Diary, 1563)
We resemble God most when we forgive our neighbors. (Diary, 1148)
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:47 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Estevao View Post
What amazes me is how liberals now constantly talk about how afraid they supposedly are. I seem to remember one of their idols say "we have nothing to fear but fear itself" but it seems the left no longer believes in that.
On CAF (and in Kansas) I am a flaming liberal. I am no more afraid than the right were with Obama.

Actually, anytime I get too worried, I remind myself that I have indoor plumbing, WiFi, live in the best country ever (sorry to those of you who live elsewhere ), don't have to worry about where my next meal is coming from, and am allowed to whine about anything I want to whine about.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:48 pm
starshiptrooper's Avatar  
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Posts: 1,744
Religion: Troubled Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by sallybutler View Post
So if it weren't for the deleterious effect on men, you'd be okay with pornography?
Then it would be a women's issue and there are plenty of Feminists without something useful to do as evidenced by this march.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:49 pm
josh987654321's Avatar
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 5,266
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

It amazes me that many protestors protesting Trump I have seen reported, are so reminiscent of those we used to see in the Middle East during Obama's Administration in the earlier years, burning cars and things, riot squads having to be formed and things being thrown at one another.

If Protestors are burning cars, burning the American flag, burning images of Trump and things like that in their protest of Trump, they are hardly peaceful and they can hardly liken themselves to MLK and the like.

I hope this has helped

God Bless

Thank you for reading
Josh
__________________
Jesus to St Faustina
You please Me most when you meditate on My Sorrowful Passion.
(Diary, 1512)
The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there.
(Diary, 1563)
We resemble God most when we forgive our neighbors. (Diary, 1148)
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:53 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by sallybutler View Post
Vulgarity and all manner of rudeness is apparently part and parcel of being politically incorrect, something to be proud of. If you tell me a word is offensive, all the more reason to use it rather than give into the word/thought police. It is as if we've become a nation of 5 year-olds who get a kick out of using naughty words.

Note that I see evidence of this on all sides of any issue. Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Independents, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, etc. Here on CAF, although somewhat muted (THANK YOU MODERATORS), on prime time TV, on cable (especially on cable).
It's called "vulgar" for a reason. The flaunting of immodesty of sexual nature.

Not something to promote and celebrate.

Has nothing to do with political in/correctness.
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:55 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by starshiptrooper View Post
Then it would be a women's issue and there are plenty of Feminists without something do as evidenced by this march.
I am totally not getting your point.

In my opinion, pornography is bad. Full stop. There is no reason for it. It hurts those who make it. It hurts those who view it. There is no socially redeeming value to it.

Perhaps this is because I am female. Perhaps it is because I am Catholic. I don't know.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:55 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by sallybutler View Post
While I wish they had not been dis-invited, perhaps it was an effort to protect them. Which also annoys me that people with differing opinions in some areas can't work together in others.
I doubt they were interested in their safety.

Feminism Today = Abortion on demand, no exception, no apology.
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old Jan 21, '17, 3:58 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by starshiptrooper View Post
Then it would be a women's issue and there are plenty of Feminists without something useful to do as evidenced by this march.
P.S. because making comments on CAF is more useful. Perhaps you and I are indulging in behavior that is just as useless.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old Jan 21, '17, 4:49 pm
Vouthon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2010
Posts: 7,140
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Peterson View Post
I stand corrected. Thank you.

That's extremely disappointing. I was under the impression the march was for all women. I guess everybody's got their sacred cow. It really does stink being a pro-life progressive, nobody likes us.
I like you!

You've found the "sweet spot" every Catholic should ideally aspire for. Consequently, its no small wonder that you may face persecution from both sides.

Chin up!
__________________
With insight into the futility of narrow nationalistic politics, the countries of Europe which have agreed to delegate sovereignty to a supranational organism have embarked on a salutary way

- Pope Pius XII (1957)
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old Jan 21, '17, 4:51 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 1,635
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComplineSanFran View Post
I disagree. Marching, exercising the right to free speech, to gather peacefully, to speak up for wrongs that need to be righted is a time honorable tradition, and we certainly note them in our history.

I know people who marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. His speech at the Lincoln Memorial is considered one of America's finest. And it changed history.

Women Suffragists who marched on Washington after the Inauguration of Woodrow Wilson brought the right for women to vote.

In 1989, in China, the Tiananmen Square protests became a part of history. Those who were martyred are still in our memory.

Our voices and presence makes a difference. Please don't ever deny anyone the right to protest where we see wrong. Or denigrate those who do.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:01 pm
Forum Elder
Greeter
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 43,903
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by mary bobo View Post
I can't figure out what they hope to accomplish. I don't think what they are doing is going to make any difference. Better they do something constructive with their times rather than parading around in pink hats.
__________________
You created every part of me; you put me together in my mother's womb. (13) when I was growing there in secret, you knew that I was there----you saw me before I was born. (15) ~~~Psalm 139
Reply With Quote
 
Jan 21, '17, 5:11 pm
Forum Elder
Greeter
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 43,903
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
These Hollywood women are so disgusting! I am so fed up with them.
I noticed Maxine Waters there too.

These women do not speak for me. They are embarrassing.

Looks like George Soros and friends are keeping busy!
__________________
You created every part of me; you put me together in my mother's womb. (13) when I was growing there in secret, you knew that I was there----you saw me before I was born. (15) ~~~Psalm 139
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:12 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7 Sorrows View Post

These women do not speak for me. They are embarrassing.
They don't speak for me, either
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:14 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2016
Posts: 3,399
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

is it safe to say that abortion is the main issue that motivates these women? It's really sad that in this country of affluence women feel they have to have access to abortion, while in some countries women are being doled out forced sterilization.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:18 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
They don't speak for me, either
Who does speak for you?
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:18 pm
Jeanne S's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2012
Posts: 10,840
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdjebS2toK0

There's this gem from Madonna
Wow! Seems to me making that kind of declaration from her feminist bully pulpit ,wanting to blow up the WH,should have some serious legal repercussions.How is it these"celebrities" can spew this kind of vitriol with impunity,disgusting!
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:21 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanne S View Post
Wow! Seems to me making that kind of declaration from her feminist bully pulpit ,wanting to blow up the WH,should have some serious legal repercussions.How is it these"celebrities" can spew this kind of vitriol with impunity,disgusting!
I'm kind of wondering if she may get a visit from the Secret Service.
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:21 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanne S View Post
Wow! Seems to me making that kind of declaration from her feminist bully pulpit ,wanting to blow up the WH,should have some serious legal repercussions.How is it these"celebrities" can spew this kind of vitriol with impunity,disgusting!
Hey, it's politically incorrect, which makes it okay, right.?

Btw, I hate this kind of language, whether Madonna, Ted Nugent, or VP Cheney.
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:24 pm
DaddyGirl's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Posts: 8,635
Religion: may the force be with you
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7 Sorrows View Post
These Hollywood women are so disgusting! I am so fed up with them.
These women do not speak for me. They are embarrassing.

Madonna isn't a "Hollywood woman".
Born and raised in Michigan, then a New Yorker, and so on.

And, since everyone here says once you are baptized Catholic, you are Catholic always...she's Catholic.

Anything Judd and Madonna said, the new president has said much, much worse.


.
__________________

Creator and member of The Rational Rat Pack:

"Wherever you go, there you are."
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:24 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Posts: 3,586
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by queenofheartscv View Post
is it safe to say that abortion is the main issue that motivates these women? It's really sad that in this country of affluence women feel they have to have access to abortion, while in some countries women are being doled out forced sterilization.
Rather than say "abortion" is the main issue that motivates these women and men, better to say abortion is the main issue that dominates the small number of people in control of the media. The protesters have absorbed the media, and absorbed the media's leading fanaticism, along with gay marriage. If the media had decided to focus heavily on some other song, these protesters would be marching to that other song.

In effect, there are 2 churches in the US and other Western countries. The media is one, backed up by higher education;

and the Catholic Church leads the other, backed up by a growing group of evangelical or conservative Protestants.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:27 pm
Forum Elder
 
Join Date: May 26, 2007
Posts: 26,868
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarcelle View Post
Yes. There should be a Men's march dedicated to authentic masculinity.

A lot better than the women's march which has an evil like abortion enshrined as a feminist sacrament. Sickening.


I agree.


Ed
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:30 pm
DaddyGirl's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Posts: 8,635
Religion: may the force be with you
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by queenofheartscv View Post
is it safe to say that abortion is the main issue that motivates these women? It's really sad that in this country of affluence women feel they have to have access to abortion, while in some countries women are being doled out forced sterilization.

Um, no. It's not safe to say that at all.


.
__________________

Creator and member of The Rational Rat Pack:

"Wherever you go, there you are."
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:34 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2016
Posts: 3,399
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl View Post
Um, no. It's not safe to say that at all.


.
I saw an interview on TV of a representative from the women's march where she said the biggest fear they have is Trump will take away abortion rights.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:35 pm
Jeanne S's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2012
Posts: 10,840
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
I'm kind of wondering if she may get a visit from the Secret Service.
Yes,that's what I think should happen.There is a woman here in Denver that tweeted something about Trump should be assiniated and it was all over the news,police questioning her .......
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:35 pm
Banned
 
Join Date: August 17, 2015
Posts: 5,225
Religion: Cradle Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeniseNY View Post
Absolutely sick, vile things were uttered by Ashley Judd.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:38 pm
starshiptrooper's Avatar  
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Posts: 1,744
Religion: Troubled Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by sallybutler View Post
I am totally not getting your point.

In my opinion, pornography is bad. Full stop. There is no reason for it. It hurts those who make it. It hurts those who view it. There is no socially redeeming value to it.

Perhaps this is because I am female. Perhaps it is because I am Catholic. I don't know.
Time to backtrack before you assumed what my opinion was. Someone brought up the idea of a Catholic men's conference and mentioned various subjects discussed at them. I pointed out that none of those are actually men's issues, just a discussion about how men can modify their behavior to better serve female interests and be reminded of how terrible and oppressive they are to boot. 
 
 
Jan 21, '17, 5:42 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2016
Posts: 3,399
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womeninth...on-washington/

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:44 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by edwest2 View Post
I agree.


Ed
And what, exactly, is real masculinity? Is it taking care of your family, making sure your wife isn't worn out from too many pregnancies or worrying about how the children will be fed, protecting all women and children from abuse, teaching boys that women are to be treated as princesses, making sure that no woman in your community has to struggle to feed her children (widows and abandoned women in particular come to mind), punishing men that violate these rules.

I have yet to see men follow these rules. I am sure that there are many that follow some of the rules. But few follow all, especially when it comes to those outside their immediate family.

So before a person complains about 'feminists', maybe they should look to how men in general, treat women. Many women are left to fend for themselves. Are you there to help them?
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:52 pm
Jeanne S's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2012
Posts: 10,840
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by queenofheartscv View Post
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womeninth...on-washington/

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.
Not surprising.GS is not going away quietly. He was so heavily vested in the last election,all the way down to the most local level and in spite of his efforts the Republicans prevailed.He has to be pretty ticked off.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:56 pm
Banned
 
Join Date: August 17, 2015
Posts: 5,225
Religion: Cradle Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by sallybutler View Post
And what, exactly, is real masculinity? Is it taking care of your family, making sure your wife isn't worn out from too many pregnancies or worrying about how the children will be fed, protecting all women and children from abuse, teaching boys that women are to be treated as princesses, making sure that no woman in your community has to struggle to feed her children (widows and abandoned women in particular come to mind), punishing men that violate these rules.

I have yet to see men follow these rules. I am sure that there are many that follow some of the rules. But few follow all, especially when it comes to those outside their immediate family.

So before a person complains about 'feminists', maybe they should look to how men in general, treat women. Many women are left to fend for themselves. Are you there to help them?
I'm just shocked the Left is approving of such language when they were so against it a few short months ago!
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old Jan 21, '17, 5:59 pm
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Posts: 21,525
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael68 View Post
I'm just shocked the Left is approving of such language when they were so against it a few short months ago!
That is an interesting point. There has been just criticism, I believe, of some of Donald Trump's past language... yet the disgusting vulgarity that was on signs, etc. regarding women and other things at the Women's March is curious. Why are so many using language which degrades women? Aren't they claming they stand up for women?
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:03 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Abyssinia View Post
That is an interesting point. There has been just criticism, I believe, of some of Donald Trump's past language... yet the disgusting vulgarity that was on signs, etc. regarding women and other things at the Women's March is curious. Why are so many using language which degrades women? Aren't they claming they stand up for women?
It isn't the language they have a problem with -- it's the advocated action that accompanied the language. I'm routinely surprised when this is overlooked, though I don't know why I am anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:03 pm
Jeanne S's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2012
Posts: 10,840
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Abyssinia View Post
That is an interesting point. There has been just criticism, I believe, of some of Donald Trump's past language... yet the disgusting vulgarity that was on signs, etc. regarding women and other things at the Women's March is curious. Why are so many using language which degrades women? Aren't they claming they stand up for women?
The hypocrisy is stunning,isn't it?!?
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:06 pm
gracepoole's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2011
Posts: 7,044
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl View Post
Um, no. It's not safe to say that at all.


.
Agreed. Of the many I know who protested today, at least 3/4 of them were focused on other issues. Nor were they all women by any means.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:08 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2007
Posts: 6,897
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

North Dakota introduced a bill that would allow motorists to run over and kill protesters obstructing a highway.

Given the number and increasing frequency of public protests...laws will change.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:14 pm
Regular Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2012
Posts: 2,361
Religion: Catholic (former Protestant)
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
Agreed. Of the many I know who protested today, at least 3/4 of them were focused on other issues. Nor were they all women by any means.
What are these issues?

Because my FB feed was just generic anti-Trump sentiments so I have no idea what the message is...

There's a lot of talk of fear, but fear of what exactly?
__________________
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:15 pm
DeniseNY's Avatar
Senior Member
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: November 30, 2011
Posts: 8,078
Religion: Byzantine Catholic ☦
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
North Dakota introduced a bill that would allow motorists to run over and kill protesters obstructing a highway.

Given the number and increasing frequency of public protests...laws will change.
__________________
Thank you, St. Jude! Patron of hopeless and impossible cases!

http://www.shrineofstjude.org/site/P...e=ssj_homepage


Please support the cause for the Beatification and Canonization of Rhoda Wise:

http://rhodawise.com/
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:16 pm
LeafByNiggle's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Posts: 10,598
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful View Post
North Dakota introduced a bill that would allow motorists to run over and kill protesters obstructing a highway.
According to the proposal, this exemption from liability only applies if it is unintentional.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:19 pm
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
 
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Posts: 21,525
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by gracepoole View Post
It isn't the language they have a problem with -- it's the advocated action that accompanied the language. I'm routinely surprised when this is overlooked, though I don't know why I am anymore.
Do you mean what was on the Billy Bush tape? There was crude language on that tape. That tape was disgusting, but he did apologise, his own wife accepted the apology. Some
people won't accept that, and I'm sure they didn't vote for him but that tape doesn't explain for example, why there was so much abortion advocacy at the March of or why there was anti-Catholic bigotry.

I don't believe that most people attended the March to protest the billy bush tape. I think most were they because they don't like Trump, they are upset that he is President, they are upset that he could do away with Planned Parenthood funding, appoint a conservative justice to the Supreme Court, do away with environmental regulations etc.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:21 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael68 View Post
I'm just shocked the Left is approving of such language when they were so against it a few short months ago!
What does that have to do with how men treat women, which is what my post was about?
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old Jan 21, '17, 6:22 pm
Regular Member
Forum Supporter
 
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 3,735
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: March for Women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanne S View Post
The hypocrisy is stunning,isn't it?!?
Not really. People in general are hypocritical. And the right just as much as the left. Or were you as incensed over VP Cheney using the same word Madonna used?
__________________
'Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.'

James 1:26
 
Reply With Quote
Reply With Quote
Reply
 
Reply With Quote

No comments:

Post a Comment