Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacBP
Well it really is only a matter of time
before the CoE falls in line with the American and Canadian Church. I
can't imagine people will standard for absolutely anything connected
with the government which doesn't treat same-sex relationships as
identical to heterosexual relationships.
The CoE, like all forms of Christianity in the West, seems to be in a
bit of a tight spot. Given pressure from the government and the public,
openly gay clergy, pressure from within the Church, a desire to be more
inclusive, and a desire to attract new membership all push the CoE
towards full acceptance of same-sex relationships. I doubt that this
will help anything. One wonders why one should take anything in the
Bible seriously if it can't get such a straightforward issue "right".
Ultimately the probable result of such a move won't be pretty for the
CoE.
|
The thing is not all forms of Christianity see it as
straightforward as do Catholics and some others. Some instead have come
to discern that Sodom was about homosexual gang rape and inhospitality.
They see other passages as condemning gay sex when performed for a pagan
ritual. They see yet other passages as referring to molesters. And see
Romans as referring to it being unnatural for a straight person to
engage in same sex relationships and that it is just as unnatural for
the gay person to engage in a heterosexual relationship.
You and other Catholics here though indeed express the Catholic belief well.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
Sep 2, '16, 9:42 pm
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: February 7, 2013
Posts: 10,030
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Please note that the fuller statement makes it clear that the
relationship is CELIBATE.. Wish they would stop doing misleading
headlines...
"Nicholas Chamberlain said he is in a long-term, celibate relationship with his male partner."
See http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/bis...ip-752814.html
|

Sep 2, '16, 11:07 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Posts: 586
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil at dayboro
This is something I just can't understand ,,,
Leviticus 20:13
You shall not lay with a man as you would a women
Plus against children
Mark 9:42
Matthew 18:6
So many times in the bible it warns against certain unacceptable behaviour,,
And yet these people preach the word of God , and yet seem not to live in the word ,
Will I ever understand why ? Are these False prophets? Should we listen to them ?
Or cast them out ? What am I to think ?
|
I do not think that it is possible to quote Leviticus - as
Leviticus forbids many practices, these were laws for the Jewish People.
How can we pick or choose which ones to follow and which ones not to
follow? If we quote one, we need to follow all of them.
How does a bishop's being gay offend little children?
|

Sep 2, '16, 11:09 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Posts: 586
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl
I wonder if this will influence more
Catholic priests who are in "gay relationships" to come out in the open
about it. Tho that one priest did last year, just before the synod, and I
think he resigned (or whatever the proper wording is).
And that other well known priest who loved and married a female parishioner...he remained a priest, but not Catholic.
Leviticus also says we should kill these men, do you agree with that?
And it says nothing about two women together...do you think that's okay?
And do you agree that we should kill children who curse their parents
and also, a man who has sex with his neighbor's wife? And if a married
couple have sex during the wife's period, they should be shunned?
Leviticus also says all spiritualists should be stoned to death. And you
shouldn't wear garments containing two materials, and men shouldn't
shave, or eat or touch fish. And if you are blind, lame, or
disfigured...you can't go up to the altar of God.
And a daughter of a priest who is deemed "immoral" should be burned to
death. And you shouldn't drink alcohol in holy places (but...what about
the wine during communion?).
And, of course, you shouldn't pick up any grapes that have fallen to the ground.
And so on, and so forth.
All the above is "unacceptable behavior" in the same paragraphs as the one you quoted, and sometimes demand death.
Do you agree with these, too?
If Moses or whoever wrote/compiled Leviticus erred with Leviticus 12,
17, 18, 20, 24, etc... chances are good they erred with Leviticus 20:13,
too.
.
|
I agree with all of this. We cannot quote one line completely out of context.
|

Sep 2, '16, 11:53 pm
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: February 7, 2013
Posts: 10,030
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by eamonnroma
I agree with all of this. We cannot quote one line completely out of context.
|
|

Sep 3, '16, 4:32 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Posts: 752
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
The thing is not all forms of
Christianity see it as straightforward as do Catholics and some others.
Some instead have come to discern that Sodom was about homosexual gang
rape and inhospitality. They see other passages as condemning gay sex
when performed for a pagan ritual. They see yet other passages as
referring to molesters. And see Romans as referring to it being
unnatural for a straight person to engage in same sex relationships and
that it is just as unnatural for the gay person to engage in a
heterosexual relationship.
You and other Catholics here though indeed express the Catholic belief well.
|
I know that some - notably Matthew Vine - have some particularly
clever ways of looking at scripture which circumvent biblical
prohibitions on homosexuality. My concern, at least for progressive
Christians, would be threefold. First, its not clear to me that their
attitudes towards homosexuality flow from scripture rather than their
reading of scripture flowing from their attitudes towards homosexuality.
If that perception is common, then people will see a cherry picking
attitude towarda scripture. Secondly, its not clear to me how many of
the lay faithful in progressive congregations could explain why
homosexuality is OK despite some apparently clear prohibitions against
it. For these individuals they really are cherry picking and the
contradiction remains. Thirdly, I think many people (myself included)
would have a difficult time believing that all people for nearly all of
history believed that scripture condemned homosexuality only for people
to discover that really scripture was secretly neutral towards it just
when there is social, political and cultural pressure to come to that
conclusion.
So ultimately even if the progressive reading of scripture on sex is
correct, I think you'll still have problems with people reconciling
those issues (even among LGBT allies).
|

Sep 3, '16, 4:40 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Posts: 752
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyGirl
If Moses or whoever wrote/compiled
Leviticus erred with Leviticus 12, 17, 18, 20, 24, etc... chances are
good they erred with Leviticus 20:13, too.
|
He didn't error though. It was a harsh law for a harsh time meant
to shape the people of Israel in preparation for the coming of Christ.
Catholics don't "ignore" elements of Mosaic Law because we think they
are wrong, but because they are no long relevant to our faith community
after the coming of Christ and the new covenant. The question for us
moderns isn't to accept or reject Leviticua wholesale, but to determine
what elements are still applicable to modern life. The problem with
dimissing the prohibition against homosexuality is that it appears to be
a moral judgement on the action rather than a matter of ceremonial law.
There's a distinction between saying that "Do this because I said so"
and "Don't do this becuase its wrong". In the latter category contains
the 10 commandements which we would nearly all agree is relevant today.
The question is rather the prohibtion against homosexuality was a matter
of ceremony or a matter of morality.
|

Sep 3, '16, 5:46 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Posts: 10,468
Religion: raised catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Plus, the fact that 'man lying with another man' (meant to imply ALL
homosexual relationships, not just men btw), was not just warned against
in the old laws, many other places in the bible saying such a thing is
wrong and an abomination to God.
When it comes to killing someone over what to us, seems like something
trivial (old Leviticus laws), that is something we must not do, Gods
ways are not our ways and vice versa, we must just accept that it was
the right thing to do.(no matter how we personally felt about it). Same
thing would be true if those laws were in effect today. Id imagine some
parents raising kids would have problems with instructing their kids to
kill over anything (even if God ordered it), so I think parents today
would have the same feelings, they would think they know better than
God.
|

Sep 3, '16, 7:21 am
|
|
New Member
|
|
Join Date: May 31, 2016
Posts: 9
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosebud77
Please note that the fuller statement makes it clear that the relationship is CELIBATE..
|
I personally don't believe that makes a difference, he is still in
a same-sex relationship. By doing this he is still acting on his
'same-sex attraction' in a self-indulgent, negative way, though not
engaging in more intimate acts.
Suffering same-sex attraction is certainly a cross to bear, however capitulation is not the answer.
|

Sep 3, '16, 11:46 am
|
 |
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
|
|
Join Date: April 21, 2005
Posts: 21,702
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
This is very sad but we should pray for him that he would repent and live a life of chastity.
|

Sep 3, '16, 2:16 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 20, 2015
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Protestant
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly3278
This is very sad but we should pray for him that he would repent and live a life of chastity.
|
See:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosebud77
Please note that the fuller statement
makes it clear that the relationship is CELIBATE.. Wish they would stop
doing misleading headlines...
"Nicholas Chamberlain said he is in a long-term, celibate relationship with his male partner."
See http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/bis...ip-752814.html
|
|

Sep 4, '16, 6:43 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Posts: 3,583
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padres1969
Seems only a matter of time before the CofE joins the ECUSA, ACinC and Anglican Church of Southern Africa.
|
Without a magisterium, any denomination will tend to drift towards
the dominant secular culture. This was described by Cardinal Newman. In
his lifetime Anglicanism was still successful in retaining Christian
orthodoxy only by the momentum of previous centuries, not by their current strength in the 19th century.
I don't know if he foresaw how aggressively powerful the secular culture
would become in an age of mass media, but he definitely saw how fragile
the Anglican current orthodoxy was. The conservative parts of
Anglicanism today may appear solid in their conviction, but in the long
run...Momentum alone won't last. All denominations that drift to the
secular culture forfeit any specific conversion from the gospel. Rather,
they will applaud the gospel whenever it happens to coincide with
secular trends.
I don't mean we can judge this particular man, he may be holier overall
than you or I. But we have to judge this as a matter of prudence
-imprudence for this particular bishop, imprudence for the denomination
that allows him to remain in this position.
|

Sep 4, '16, 7:27 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: July 25, 2014
Posts: 4,132
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter
Without a magisterium, any denomination
will tend to drift towards the dominant secular culture. This was
described by Cardinal Newman. In his lifetime Anglicanism was still
successful in retaining Christian orthodoxy only by the momentum of previous centuries, not by their current strength in the 19th century.
I don't know if he foresaw how aggressively powerful the secular culture
would become in an age of mass media, but he definitely saw how fragile
the Anglican current orthodoxy was. The conservative parts of
Anglicanism today may appear solid in their conviction, but in the long
run...Momentum alone won't last. All denominations that drift to the
secular culture forfeit any specific conversion from the gospel. Rather,
they will applaud the gospel whenever it happens to coincide with
secular trends.
I don't mean we can judge this particular man, he may be holier overall
than you or I. But we have to judge this as a matter of prudence
-imprudence for this particular bishop, imprudence for the denomination
that allows him to remain in this position.
|
Even with a Magisterium, secular culture exerts a very strong influence.
|

Sep 4, '16, 12:32 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 4, 2014
Posts: 5,628
Religion: Lutheran (ELCA)
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter
I don't mean we can judge this particular
man, he may be holier overall than you or I. But we have to judge this
as a matter of prudence -imprudence for this particular bishop, imprudence for the denomination that allows him to remain in this position.
|
Some denominations such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America (ELCA) and the Episcopal Church USA don't have any problem with
clergy (including bishops) being gay and being in same-sex relationships
and they don't even have to be celibate. I know of at least one gay
bishop in the ELCA and have been introduced to his same-sex spouse. I'm
sure that the Church of England is not far behind.
|

Sep 4, '16, 12:49 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Posts: 1,086
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob_Christopher
Last week the Archbishop of Canterbury said in an interview that he
"couldn't see the road ahead" when it came to the Church's policy on
sexuality.
|
There isn't a "road ahead" in the Church of England, but rather a
fork in the road. One road leads to interpretive Protestant lines of
Christianity, in which you advance the portions of the Gospel you like,
and excuse the remainder. This road has been gone down pretty far
already in the Church of England, and very far in many Protestant
churches in the US. When is the last time, for example, you head any
Protestant church emphasize Christ's teaching on divorce and remarriage
being adultery? No doubt somewhere it's done, but rarely, and basically
this is part of the Christian faith that's just ignored in most
Protestant communities. That's the same position the Church of England
will take in this issue in large part everywhere, and just ignore and
accommodate it, irrespective of what Christ said.
The other road leads to Rome.
|

Sep 4, '16, 1:12 pm
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2014
Posts: 255
Religion: Roman Catholick, 3/22/15
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
The thing is not all forms of
Christianity see it as straightforward as do Catholics and some others.
Some instead have come to discern that Sodom was about homosexual gang
rape and inhospitality. They see other passages as condemning gay sex
when performed for a pagan ritual. They see yet other passages as
referring to molesters. And see Romans as referring to it being
unnatural for a straight person to engage in same sex relationships and
that it is just as unnatural for the gay person to engage in a
heterosexual relationship.
|
And what Church Father interpreted those passages as such? Which
council? Pope? "Reformer?" Any prominent, remotely orthodox Christian
prior to, say, the last century?
__________________
The modern clergy preach that there is a social reform capable of wiping out the consequences of sin.
From which one can deduce the pointlessness of redemption through Christ.
~Don Colacho
|
Sep 4, '16, 1:13 pm
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2014
Posts: 255
Religion: Roman Catholick, 3/22/15
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by eamonnroma
I do not think that it is possible to
quote Leviticus - as Leviticus forbids many practices, these were laws
for the Jewish People. How can we pick or choose which ones to follow
and which ones not to follow? If we quote one, we need to follow all of
them.
How does a bishop's being gay offend little children?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eamonnroma
I agree with all of this. We cannot quote one line completely out of context.
|
It's the Lutherans but they're pretty much correct.
__________________
The modern clergy preach that there is a social reform capable of wiping out the consequences of sin.
From which one can deduce the pointlessness of redemption through Christ.
~Don Colacho
|

Sep 4, '16, 2:17 pm
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Byzantine Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by eamonnroma
I agree with all of this. We cannot quote one line completely out of context.
|
Kind of a wordy article but it explains common misunderstandings about the Mosaic Law in the context of Christianity.
Quote:
The Bible on Homosexual Behavior
Its condemnation is on moral, not ceremonial, grounds
By: Trent Horn
In conclusion, if the author of Leviticus were alive today, he would say
that prohibitions on same-sex intercourse apply not just to Jews who
were given the Mosaic Law but also to people who can understand the
natural law through their moral conscience. This is a theme St. Paul
explores in the Bible’s other explicit condemnation of same-sex behavior
. . .
By “unnatural,” Paul did not mean these relationships contained excess
sexual desire or that they were an affront to social mores (such as when
he admonished men with long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14). Paul meant
that the general idea of same-sex intercourse violates the image of God
made known in human bodies that were created male and female . . .
What all of these exchanges have in common is not a failure to adhere to
society’s moral norms but a failure to adhere to the natural order seen
in creation itself -- whether it’s worship of the creator or sexual
relations with the natural partner. Paul even uses the Greek words for
“male” and “female” instead of the Greek words for “men” and “women,” no
doubt referring to the creation account in Genesis 1 which describes
how God made humans “male and female” (Gen. 1:27).
|
http://www.catholic.com/magazine/art...exual-behavior
Quote:
The following New Testament passages deal with homosexual acts:
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up
natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one
another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their
own persons the due penalty for their error. (Rom 1:26-27)
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of
God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor
adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards,
nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1Cor
6:9-10)
[T]he law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and
disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane,
for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever
else is contrary to sound doctrine. (1 Tm 1:9-10)
[J]ust as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise
acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by
undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. (Jude 7)
But God’s displeasure with acting out on homosexuality is depicted as
early as Genesis 19 in the Old Testament. Also see Leviticus 18:22 and
20:13.
—Jim Blackburn
|
http://www.catholic.com/quickquestio...e-of-homosexua
Folks also tend to forget Sacred Tradition and Natural Law, and that the Catholicism is not sola scriptura.
Quote:
Chastity and homosexuality
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who
experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons
of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the
centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains
largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents
homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always
declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They
are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift
of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual
complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
|
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a6.htm#2357
__________________
"It's a free country; you can say whatever you want."
--Old American Saying
(U.S. Postal Service stamp-- from 1977 Americana series which extols
freedom of speech and features a Speaker's Stand decorated with an
American Flag shield.)
|

Sep 4, '16, 3:58 pm
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 11, 2015
Posts: 137
Religion: Agnostic turning Catholic?
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosebud77
Please note that the fuller statement
makes it clear that the relationship is CELIBATE.. Wish they would stop
doing misleading headlines...
"Nicholas Chamberlain said he is in a long-term, celibate relationship with his male partner."
See http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/bis...ip-752814.html
|
So there's no reason to fuss about this?
Having a celibate relationship doesn't qualify as a sin right. He isn't
having intercourse out of wedlock. So.. I don't understand the
commotion. Thanks!
__________________
Born in a Dutch non-practicing Catholic family. I'm here to learn about a
faith which I already hold dear. As of now I'm still agnostic who is
trying to build faith in a very secular society. -Young Ludovicus
|

Sep 4, '16, 6:46 pm
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Posts: 6,425
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Ludovicus
So there's no reason to fuss about this?
Having a celibate relationship doesn't qualify as a sin right. He isn't
having intercourse out of wedlock. So.. I don't understand the
commotion. Thanks!
|
I see at least two problems with that.
First of all chastity is not just about physical intercourse. Think of a
married person. If they're attracted to someone other than their
spouse, they have to be very real with themselves about how they
interact with that person (e.g., is it flirty?), as well as how much
they interact with them. It's not healthy to entertain a fantasy that
cannot be followed through with, especially when the fantasy is
potentially a proximate occasion of sin.
Second, chaste cohabitation is a sin if it causes scandal. I.e., the
optics causes others to fall into sin. In the case of a public figure,
the chance of causing scandal is higher.
|

Sep 4, '16, 8:09 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,032
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosGamma
And what Church Father interpreted those
passages as such? Which council? Pope? "Reformer?" Any prominent,
remotely orthodox Christian prior to, say, the last century?
|
To the progressive Christian, the last century is not so easily
dismissed as a time when human finite understanding of an infinite Being
(God) and understanding of Scripture could not possibly evolve and grow
and develop. That's what it means to be progressive. You speak the
Catholic perspective well though.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Sep 5, '16, 10:58 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Posts: 3,583
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfengr
Even with a Magisterium, secular culture exerts a very strong influence.
|
True. Think of the Magisterium as a lighthouse, a fixed landmark
on the land. During the daytime, in calm weather, most sailors might be
more or less able to stay on the right path, without much consulting the
lighthouse, just sort of on momentum. 50 years ago Catholics and
Anglicans didn't need religious authority to tell them abortion or same
sex marriage was wrong. They knew it.
Today, the secular culture does exert a very powerful influence
on sailors, or it urges Anglicans, Catholics, everybody, not to consult
the Magisterium. So the secular culture reduces the population looking
to the Magisterium, but doesn't affect the Magisterium itself.
The lighthouse is not influenced by the conditions around it, but sailors can be persuaded to ignore the lighthouse.
|

Sep 6, '16, 7:27 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosebud77
Please note that the fuller statement
makes it clear that the relationship is CELIBATE.. Wish they would stop
doing misleading headlines...
"Nicholas Chamberlain said he is in a long-term, celibate relationship with his male partner."
See http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/bis...ip-752814.html
|
Long-term, celibate relationships with other people are called
friendships. They aren't called partners. Two men living together as
friends are called roommates. The wording used by the COE leader is
dangerous and contrary to the Christian faith.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob_Christopher
I personally don't believe that makes a
difference, he is still in a same-sex relationship. By doing this he is
still acting on his 'same-sex attraction' in a self-indulgent, negative
way, though not engaging in more intimate acts.
Suffering same-sex attraction is certainly a cross to bear, however capitulation is not the answer.
|
Agreed. He's indulging in the fantasy that he can be in a
relationship similar to marriage with a man, even if he doesn't have sex
with the man. It's false. He's intentionally blurring the reality of
marriage and trying to further dismantle society's understanding of what
marriage is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by commenter
Without a magisterium, any denomination
will tend to drift towards the dominant secular culture. This was
described by Cardinal Newman. In his lifetime Anglicanism was still
successful in retaining Christian orthodoxy only by the momentum of previous centuries, not by their current strength in the 19th century.
I don't know if he foresaw how aggressively powerful the secular culture
would become in an age of mass media, but he definitely saw how fragile
the Anglican current orthodoxy was. The conservative parts of
Anglicanism today may appear solid in their conviction, but in the long
run...Momentum alone won't last. All denominations that drift to the
secular culture forfeit any specific conversion from the gospel. Rather,
they will applaud the gospel whenever it happens to coincide with
secular trends.
I don't mean we can judge this particular man, he may be holier overall
than you or I. But we have to judge this as a matter of prudence
-imprudence for this particular bishop, imprudence for the denomination
that allows him to remain in this position.
|
The longer one is separated from Peter, the further they drift from the Christian faith.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Ludovicus
So there's no reason to fuss about this?
Having a celibate relationship doesn't qualify as a sin right. He isn't
having intercourse out of wedlock. So.. I don't understand the
commotion. Thanks!
|
He's pretending that another man is his "partner" and they are in a "gay relationship". This is sinful behavior to claim such.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
To the progressive Christian, the last
century is not so easily dismissed as a time when human finite
understanding of an infinite Being (God) and understanding of Scripture
could not possibly evolve and grow and develop. That's what it means to
be progressive. You speak the Catholic perspective well though.
|
Up next will be another Church Council to determine the question of Christ's divinity!
|

Sep 6, '16, 7:34 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: February 7, 2013
Posts: 10,030
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob_Christopher
I personally don't believe that makes a
difference, he is still in a same-sex relationship. By doing this he is
still acting on his 'same-sex attraction' in a self-indulgent, negative
way, though not engaging in more intimate acts.
Suffering same-sex attraction is certainly a cross to bear, however capitulation is not the answer.
|
True and it went against the grain when I wrote that but I felt it
needed saying. BUT I have female friendships? And females share houses
without being in that kind of committed relationship?
And I grieve for the church of my childhood and so much of my adulthood
too, It was not like this then. It was strong and supportive. It was I
realise suddely only thanks to clergy and friends within that Church
that , literally, I survived the years of my suffering and danger.
At some stage the whole fabric and foundation changed from God to this?
.
|

Sep 14, '16, 8:48 am
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 11, 2015
Posts: 137
Religion: Agnostic turning Catholic?
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz912
Long-term, celibate relationships with
other people are called friendships. They aren't called partners. Two
men living together as friends are called roommates. The wording used by
the COE leader is dangerous and contrary to the Christian faith.
Agreed. He's indulging in the fantasy that he can be in a relationship
similar to marriage with a man, even if he doesn't have sex with the
man. It's false. He's intentionally blurring the reality of marriage and
trying to further dismantle society's understanding of what marriage
is.
The longer one is separated from Peter, the further they drift from the Christian faith.
He's pretending that another man is his "partner" and they are in a "gay relationship". This is sinful behavior to claim such.
|
Only a man and a woman can marry according to our lord and can
procreate. To have sex if you aren't religiously married, is a sin.
There's no difference between a straight couple or a same sex couple.
Both are equally sinning if they have sex. Why are you singling out the
same sex couples?
It's not that homosexual sex is more of a sin than an unmarried
cohabitating straight couple having sex. Why is it that people are
focussing more on homosexual couples, while both are equal sins?!
If homosexual men or women refrain from sex, they aren't sinning. Stop the witchhunt.
__________________
Born in a Dutch non-practicing Catholic family. I'm here to learn about a
faith which I already hold dear. As of now I'm still agnostic who is
trying to build faith in a very secular society. -Young Ludovicus
|

Sep 15, '16, 7:51 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Church of England bishop "in a gay relationship"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Ludovicus
Only a man and a woman can marry
according to our lord and can procreate. To have sex if you aren't
religiously married, is a sin. There's no difference between a straight
couple or a same sex couple. Both are equally sinning if they have sex.
Why are you singling out the same sex couples?
It's not that homosexual sex is more of a sin than an unmarried
cohabitating straight couple having sex. Why is it that people are
focussing more on homosexual couples, while both are equal sins?!
If homosexual men or women refrain from sex, they aren't sinning. Stop the witchhunt.
|
God never said the sins of homosexual sex and heterosexual sex
outside marriage are equal. In fact the Bible and Church tradition says
they are not equal, that homosexual sex is worse.
Two homosexual men who claim to be married or in a gay relationship are
sinning by promoting the evil that what they are doing is okay or that
homosexuality is not intrinsically disordered. No matter if they are
having sex or not, they are promoting falsity and evil.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment