Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ojo Feliz
So North Carolina now requires people to carry their birth certificate when they use a public restroom?
I think you make a good point that transgender people, in most states,
are able to get new birth certificates after they have completed
surgery. However, not all states do this. And what about the persons who
are still in the process of crossing over? Aren't transgender people
expected to live a year or two in their chosen gender before they can
receive surgery?
|
Will North Carolina accept the birth certificate of Hawaii or does it have to be the long form?
Frankly, all this is silly. If Governor Kasich is saying he won't
support this because it is a colossal waste of time, then that is a
compelling reason to vote for him.
He is not as socially conservative as some here might like though and
did fail to support the 'heartbeat bill' in Ohio that would have made
many (most?) abortions illegal. He also made a big point of going to a
gay marriage in an early Republican debate.
Apr 10, '16, 4:34 pm
|
 |
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Posts: 34,025
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
So he doesn't believe in an overreaching government that meddles in the
affairs of private businesses. That is kind of Republican, or is outside
of North Carollina.
__________________
"Then the
King will say to those on His right, 'Come, you who are blessed of My
Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the
world. For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in." - Jesus
Nooo!! I didn't mean it!
|

Apr 10, '16, 5:01 pm
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: December 21, 2015
Posts: 183
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnewton
So he doesn't believe in an overreaching
government that meddles in the affairs of private businesses. That is
kind of Republican, or is outside of North Carollina.
|
The law as I understand it does not effect private businesses.
Here in Ontario transgenders are allowed to use whichever
bathroom/changeroom they wish... there was a case at a YMCA where a
transgendered woman (biological man) was caught staring at a woman while
she was taking a shower... he approached her with an erected penis and
asked her "do you come her often?" The woman complained but was told
that the man had every right to be in that changeroom. I wonder what
Kasich would say about that.
|

Apr 10, '16, 5:10 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 26,596
Religion: Jewish
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball
The law as I understand it does not effect private businesses.
Here in Ontario transgenders are allowed to use whichever
bathroom/changeroom they wish... there was a case at a YMCA where a
transgendered woman (biological man) was caught staring at a woman while
she was taking a shower... he approached her with an erected penis and
asked her "do you come her often?" The woman complained but was told
that the man had every right to be in that changeroom. I wonder what
Kasich would say about that.
|
Who knows what Kasich would say to that incident? How do you feel
about gay men sharing the same bathroom as straight men? (Or gay women
sharing the same bathroom as straight women?) That used to be a major
issue, but no longer is.
|

Apr 10, '16, 5:23 pm
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 5,262
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazcompat
|
I think that's fair enough.
Girl/Boy, Man/Woman isn't open to interpretation, if they have the stuff
downstairs, well, they should know what bathroom they are expected to
use regardless of how they identify/see themselves I think.
The trouble with this whole thing I believe, is how open to
interpretation it is and obviously corruption and abuse, because if a
guy said he was a woman and wanted to use the girls bathrooms, common
sense would say no. On the other hand, someone like Bruce Jenner, who
now calls himself Caitlyn Jenner and has physically harmed himself with
sex reassignment surgery  probably shouldn't be forced to use men's bathrooms.
Anyway, just some of my thoughts.
I hope this has helped
Thank you for reading
Josh
__________________
Jesus to St Faustina
You please Me most when you meditate on My Sorrowful Passion.
(Diary, 1512)
The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there.
(Diary, 1563)
We resemble God most when we forgive our neighbors. (Diary, 1148)
|

Apr 10, '16, 5:29 pm
|
 |
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: April 7, 2008
Posts: 17,590
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball
The law as I understand it does not effect private businesses.
Here in Ontario transgenders are allowed to use whichever
bathroom/changeroom they wish... there was a case at a YMCA where a
transgendered woman (biological man) was caught staring at a woman while
she was taking a shower... he approached her with an erected penis and
asked her "do you come her often?" The woman complained but was told
that the man had every right to be in that changeroom. I wonder what
Kasich would say about that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltzerboy
Who knows what Kasich would say to that incident?
|
I don't, but I can definitely imagine the media asking him.
|

Apr 10, '16, 5:45 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 28,250
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball
The law as I understand it does not effect private businesses.
Here in Ontario transgenders are allowed to use whichever
bathroom/changeroom they wish... there was a case at a YMCA where a
transgendered woman (biological man) was caught staring at a woman while
she was taking a shower... he approached her with an erected penis and
asked her "do you come her often?" The woman complained but was told
that the man had every right to be in that changeroom. I wonder what
Kasich would say about that.
|
Indeed. And what would all the corporate opponents of the bil say
about it? Is it okay in a Disney restroom for such an incident to
occur?
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:05 pm
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 17, 2016
Posts: 2,137
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
You mean in a Republican primary, right?
I'm not as sure stronger stances on the culture wars as you call them,
help as much in a general. But then maybe since he knows he can not win
the nomination the usual way, he is saying this to appeal to the party
bosses by demonstrating that he is the only one of the remaining 3 to
best take on Hillary Clinton. Oh wait a second. That is what he has already been doing. 
|
I mean that he will get more votes from Republicans.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:13 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Posts: 3,964
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
My wife does not permit me to use a restroom with women and vice-a-
versa. I will not have my granddaughters in a restroom that adult males
are permitted to use. Sorry if that offends you.
Peace
__________________
 Jesus Christ Is Our Father's Simple Plan for Salvation Since Before Time Began.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:17 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 28,250
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:32 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Posts: 3,964
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
When the people of a state speak, and corporations threaten the will of
the people, the people should boycott the corporations. To capitulate
virtue to economic threats is wrong. Then again I'm poor and long time
used to it. If I were a politician it might effect my chances of
re-election. Then again corporations are people too.
Peace
__________________
 Jesus Christ Is Our Father's Simple Plan for Salvation Since Before Time Began.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:34 pm
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 17, 2016
Posts: 2,137
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazcompat
When the people of a state speak, and
corporations threaten the will of the people, the people should boycott
the corporations. To capitulate virtue to economic threats is wrong.
Then again I'm poor and long time used to it. If I were a politician it
might effect my chances of re-election. Then again corporations are
people too.
Peace
|
I agree with you. We should not let liberal corporations bully us into submission.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:36 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: August 27, 2013
Posts: 2,148
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph3
John Kasich should take a stronger stance on the Culture Wars. He would gain more votes that way.
|
Actually, Kasich isn't the one who has praised the "wonderful"
work Planned Parenthood does for women -- except for when it comes to
abortion -- so, I don't think he's the one who should be taking a
stronger stance in the so-called "culture wars." God bless Kasich for
being the only GOP candidate with a proven track record defending the
unborn.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:41 pm
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 17, 2016
Posts: 2,137
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomuser
Actually, Kasich isn't the one who has
praised the "wonderful" work Planned Parenthood does for women -- except
for when it comes to abortion -- so, I don't think he's the one who
should be taking a stronger stance in the so-called "culture wars." God
bless Kasich for being the only GOP candidate with a proven track record
defending the unborn.
|
How about Ted Cruz?
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:47 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Posts: 3,964
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
The Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen...
The world may charge the Church with intolerance, and the world is
right. The Church is intolerant; intolerant about Truth, intolerant
about principles, intolerant about Divinity, just as Our Blessed Lord
was intolerant about His Divinity. The other religions may change their
principles, and they do change them, because their principles are
man-made. The Church cannot change, because her principles are God-made.
Religion is not a sum of beliefs that we would like, but the sum of
beliefs God has given. The world may disagree with the Church, but the
world knows very definitely with what it is disagreeing. In the future
as in the past, the Church will be intolerant about the sanctity of
marriage, for what God has joined together no man shall put asunder; she
will be intolerant about her creed, and be ready to die for it, for she
fears not those who kill the body, but rather those who have the power
to cast body and soul into hell. She will be intolerant about her
infallibility, for “Lo,” says Christ, “I am with you all the days even
unto the end of the world.” And while she is intolerant even to blood,
in adhering to the truths given her by her Divine Founder, she will be
tolerant to those who say she is intolerant, for the same Divine Founder
has taught her to say: “Father, forgive them, they know not what they
do.”
There are only two positions to take concerning truth, and both of them
had their hearing centuries ago in the court-room of Solomon where two
women claimed a babe. A babe is like truth; it is one; it is whole; it
is organic and it cannot be divided. The real mother of ‘the babe would
accept no compromise. She was intolerant about her claim. She must have
the whole babe, or nothing-the intolerance of Motherhood. But the false
mother was tolerant. She was willing to compromise. She was willing to
divide the babe-and the babe would have met its death through
broadmindedness.
Taken from the book “Moods and Truths” (Published in 1932)
Peace
__________________
 Jesus Christ Is Our Father's Simple Plan for Salvation Since Before Time Began.
|

Apr 10, '16, 6:51 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Posts: 3,964
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
I am an ex-Kasich fan.
Peace
__________________
 Jesus Christ Is Our Father's Simple Plan for Salvation Since Before Time Began.
Apr 10, '16, 6:53 pm
|
 |
Forum Master
|
|
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 21,514
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
I heard him say this today. Does this
mean he will never be the Republican nominee? I know he has already said
he would make the worst VP. So I can't imagine the party would nominate
and vote for someone for VP who has made such a claim about himself.
|
He's running for president. Of course he's going to brush off being second.
__________________
"The left is no longer liberal"-----Dave Rubin
"Social network censorship----SEE HOW FAR THEY GET WITH IT!!!!!" --------from Social Justice the Musical
"...censorship begins with me, but will end with you". --Milo Yiannapolous
Hate speech = free speech #1A #2A
|

Apr 10, '16, 7:17 pm
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 5,262
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazcompat
The Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen...
The world may charge the Church with intolerance, and the world is
right. The Church is intolerant; intolerant about Truth, intolerant
about principles, intolerant about Divinity, just as Our Blessed Lord
was intolerant about His Divinity. The other religions may change their
principles, and they do change them, because their principles are
man-made. The Church cannot change, because her principles are God-made.
Religion is not a sum of beliefs that we would like, but the sum of
beliefs God has given. The world may disagree with the Church, but the
world knows very definitely with what it is disagreeing. In the future
as in the past, the Church will be intolerant about the sanctity of
marriage, for what God has joined together no man shall put asunder; she
will be intolerant about her creed, and be ready to die for it, for she
fears not those who kill the body, but rather those who have the power
to cast body and soul into hell. She will be intolerant about her
infallibility, for “Lo,” says Christ, “I am with you all the days even
unto the end of the world.” And while she is intolerant even to blood,
in adhering to the truths given her by her Divine Founder, she will be
tolerant to those who say she is intolerant, for the same Divine Founder
has taught her to say: “Father, forgive them, they know not what they
do.”
There are only two positions to take concerning truth, and both of them
had their hearing centuries ago in the court-room of Solomon where two
women claimed a babe. A babe is like truth; it is one; it is whole; it
is organic and it cannot be divided. The real mother of ‘the babe would
accept no compromise. She was intolerant about her claim. She must have
the whole babe, or nothing-the intolerance of Motherhood. But the false
mother was tolerant. She was willing to compromise. She was willing to
divide the babe-and the babe would have met its death through
broadmindedness.
Taken from the book “Moods and Truths” (Published in 1932)
Peace
|
I have never read that before, very much enjoyed it, thank you for sharing it.
God Bless
Thank you for reading
Josh
__________________
Jesus to St Faustina
You please Me most when you meditate on My Sorrowful Passion.
(Diary, 1512)
The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there.
(Diary, 1563)
We resemble God most when we forgive our neighbors. (Diary, 1148)
|

Apr 10, '16, 7:25 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: April 26, 2008
Posts: 3,964
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Pope saint John Paul II
Fides Et Ratio
2. The Church is no stranger to this journey of discovery, nor could she
ever be. From the moment when, through the Paschal Mystery, she
received the gift of the ultimate truth about human life, the Church has
made her pilgrim way along the paths of the world to proclaim that
Jesus Christ is “the way, and the truth, and the life” (Jn 14:6). It is
her duty to serve humanity in different ways, but one way in particular
imposes a responsibility of a quite special kind: the diakonia of the
truth.1 This mission on the one hand makes the believing community a
partner in humanity's shared struggle to arrive at truth; 2 and on the
other hand it obliges the believing community to proclaim the certitudes
arrived at, albeit with a sense that every truth attained is but a step
towards that fullness of truth which will appear with the final
Revelation of God: “For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to
face. Now I know in part; then I shall understand fully” (1 Cor 13:12).
Peace
__________________
 Jesus Christ Is Our Father's Simple Plan for Salvation Since Before Time Began.
|

Apr 10, '16, 8:20 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,022
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Will North Carolina accept the birth certificate of Hawaii or does it have to be the long form?
|
 That was one of the funniest things I've read on CAF today. I don't know. Just cracked me up.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Apr 11, '16, 3:23 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: December 15, 2007
Posts: 22,961
Religion: Life-long Lutheran, now Anglican Province of America
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnewton
So he doesn't believe in an overreaching
government that meddles in the affairs of private businesses. That is
kind of Republican, or is outside of North Carollina.
|
In fact, it was the Charlotte ordinance that meddled in the affairs of private businesses. HB2 ended that.
Jon
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:05 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: December 15, 2007
Posts: 22,961
Religion: Life-long Lutheran, now Anglican Province of America
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by graciew

I refuse to go.to the bathroom carrying a birth certificate . How does
one expect to find it in a.woman s purse when one is in a hurry!
Will there be a "/birth certificate scanner " or what?
One of these days we have to organize " a soon to be and senior ladies" protest.... 
|
I've read through HB2, and have seen no requirement for producing a
birth certificate. Do you have documentation that this is the case?
OTOH, under the Charlotte ordinance, how was a business to know if the
person standing before them is transgender? Were they not required to
sign a form?
Jon
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:18 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ojo Feliz
So North Carolina now requires people to carry their birth certificate when they use a public restroom?
I think you make a good point that transgender people, in most states,
are able to get new birth certificates after they have completed
surgery. However, not all states do this. And what about the persons who
are still in the process of crossing over? Aren't transgender people
expected to live a year or two in their chosen gender before they can
receive surgery?
|
I guess they are going to have to hold it until the paperwork comes through.
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:21 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: December 15, 2007
Posts: 22,961
Religion: Life-long Lutheran, now Anglican Province of America
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfengr
Who would have thought, 20 years ago,
that the dominant civil rights issue of 2016 would be the right of men
to use women's bathrooms?
|
It isn't. If this was truly the big "civil rights", all the faux
indignation would have happened last year when the ordinance in
Charlotte did not pass.
This is an election year. For the progressive movement , the issue doesn't matter, power does.
Jon
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:35 am
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: December 21, 2015
Posts: 183
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltzerboy
Who knows what Kasich would say to that
incident? How do you feel about gay men sharing the same bathroom as
straight men? (Or gay women sharing the same bathroom as straight
women?) That used to be a major issue, but no longer is.
|
Then let's get rid of male/female rooms altogether, we can let the
highschool football team to shower with the cheerleeders after the
game. It was thought to be a problem in the past, but apparently
biological sex no longer matters.
|

Apr 11, '16, 5:03 am
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Join Date: April 4, 2016
Posts: 75
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Will North Carolina accept the birth certificate of Hawaii or does it have to be the long form?
Frankly, all this is silly. If Governor Kasich is saying he won't
support this because it is a colossal waste of time, then that is a
compelling reason to vote for him.
He is not as socially conservative as some here might like though and
did fail to support the 'heartbeat bill' in Ohio that would have made
many (most?) abortions illegal. He also made a big point of going to a
gay marriage in an early Republican debate.
|
Regardless of his specific position on abortion provisions in his
state (though I hardly think he can be called pro-abortion with any
degree of fairness), and the merits of the whole transgender-bathroom
debate generally...
I agree with Crossbones that any politician who yet retains sufficient
common sense to recognise a patently absurd and unenforceable bill when
he sees one, ought to get more support. Politics is about ideology and
ideas and compromise - and also knowing what is realistic and actually
practical.
|

Apr 11, '16, 5:21 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: July 25, 2014
Posts: 4,105
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by EleanorArr
Regardless of his specific position on
abortion provisions in his state (though I hardly think he can be called
pro-abortion with any degree of fairness), and the merits of the whole
transgender-bathroom debate generally...
I agree with Crossbones that any politician who yet retains sufficient
common sense to recognise a patently absurd and unenforceable bill when
he sees one, ought to get more support. Politics is about ideology and
ideas and compromise - and also knowing what is realistic and actually
practical.
|
It's actually pretty easy to enforce, if you have a penis you
don't use the women's bathroom. It's only hard because you want to make
it hard (no pun intended).
|

Apr 11, '16, 5:35 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfengr
It's actually pretty easy to enforce, if
you have a penis you don't use the women's bathroom. It's only hard
because you want to make it hard (no pun intended).
|
It gives a whole new meaning to the term bathroom monitors.
|

Apr 11, '16, 6:11 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,704
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ojo Feliz
So North Carolina now requires people to carry their birth certificate when they use a public restroom? 
|
I'm sure this won't be required, and that the intent is to enforce
the law on a "complaint basis", as most laws are. So a guy dressed as a
woman goes into a womens' rest room and, in doing his duty makes it
obvious he's really a guy. Women get offended and complain. That's what
this is about.
I doubt there would be a lot of complaints about a woman using a mens'
restroom. I think this is basically to protect women from having to use a
restroom with men.
|

Apr 11, '16, 8:05 am
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: June 23, 2014
Posts: 1,045
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfengr
It's actually pretty easy to enforce, if
you have a penis you don't use the women's bathroom. It's only hard
because you want to make it hard (no pun intended).
|
Yes.
Although to be fair to EleanorArr's point - it is easily self-enforced.
Which is to say if we can assume people will behave "normally" (that
is, in accordance with accepted custom with regards bathrooms, changing
rooms, etc), then the law is just a statement of common sense.
But it's only legally enforceable if there is some means to check that
people with 'male' on their birth certificate use male bathrooms and
'females' use those designated for females. Having to produce a piece of
paper every time one wants to use a public bathroom would probably
count as onerous and intrusive.
Which doesn't mean I think the underlying principle of the law is bad - just that the law itself kind of is.
__________________
 "Where
else have we ever seen someone who has been offended, voluntarily paying
out his life for those who have offended him?" - St. Catherine of Siena
|

Apr 11, '16, 10:22 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: August 11, 2004
Posts: 16,492
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
University of Toronto re-designates some facilities in a dorm building in which there were two complaints of men secretly videoing women as they showered.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely
exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It
would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral
busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity
may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own
good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience."
CS Lewis–God in the Dock, 1948
|
Apr 11, '16, 10:28 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,704
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murmurs
But it's only legally enforceable if
there is some means to check that people with 'male' on their birth
certificate use male bathrooms and 'females' use those designated for
females. Having to produce a piece of paper every time one wants to use a
public bathroom would probably count as onerous and intrusive.
Which doesn't mean I think the underlying principle of the law is bad - just that the law itself kind of is.
|
No. The "producing of birth certificates" would be at the police
station after a woman complained that some guy was in the womens'
restroom. It wouldn't even come up unless the casual observer could
tell.
Probably most men would put up with some guy in drag using the mens'
restroom. Most women would be greatly discomfited it they knew a user of
their restroom was really a guy, and rightly so. These kinds of laws
are fundamentally designed to protect womens' privacy over that of some
guy who wants to pretend he's a woman for whatever reason he wants to do
it.
|

Apr 11, '16, 11:48 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: October 21, 2015
Posts: 893
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfengr
It's actually pretty easy to enforce, if
you have a penis you don't use the women's bathroom. It's only hard
because you want to make it hard (no pun intended).
|
How do you handle hermaphrodites?
|

Apr 11, '16, 11:52 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 1, 2007
Posts: 2,427
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFerri48
How do you handle hermaphrodites?
|
By allowing them to use whichever bathroom corresponds most
closely to their actual urogenital tract, then tossing out that rotten
red herring that keeps getting thrown around when discussing this issue.
|

Apr 11, '16, 12:43 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 26,596
Religion: Jewish
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball
Then let's get rid of male/female rooms
altogether, we can let the highschool football team to shower with the
cheerleeders after the game. It was thought to be a problem in the past,
but apparently biological sex no longer matters.
|
My point is that these problems tend to work themselves out over
time. Just as people are usually not harmed by gays who share the same
bathroom with straights (which was once considered a dangerous
situation), they will not be harmed by transgenders. They may feel
uncomfortable at first, but people will get used to it.
Although unisex bathrooms have been suggested and are even in existence
at least in one university (there is another thread on this), I'm not
quite ready for that. But I'm from the older generation and never
adapted to unisex hairstylists either (from the 1970's, IIRC).
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:27 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: October 21, 2015
Posts: 893
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey1976
By allowing them to use whichever
bathroom corresponds most closely to their actual urogenital tract, then
tossing out that rotten red herring that keeps getting thrown around
when discussing this issue.
|
It's not a red herring, it's a legitimate question if bathroom use is simply based on the genitalia.
|

Apr 11, '16, 4:50 pm
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: December 21, 2015
Posts: 183
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltzerboy
My point is that these problems tend to
work themselves out over time. Just as people are usually not harmed by
gays who share the same bathroom with straights (which was once
considered a dangerous situation), they will not be harmed by
transgenders. They may feel uncomfortable at first, but people will get used to it.
Although unisex bathrooms have been suggested and are even in existence
at least in one university (there is another thread on this), I'm not quite ready for that. But I'm from the older generation and never adapted to unisex hairstylists either (from the 1970's, IIRC).
|
Why not? You may feel uncomfortable at first, but you'll get used to it.
|

Apr 11, '16, 6:55 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 28,250
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball
Why not? You may feel un comfortable at first, but you'll get used to it. 
|
And the cheerleaders will get used to using the football players locker room. It's all flexible.
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:25 pm
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 5,262
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFerri48
How do you handle hermaphrodites?
|
I would leave that up to the medical professionals who know about
the individual case to best decide how one should proceed (I think they
have to wait until puberty to see what needs to be done and how the body
is responding to make an informed decision, until which time they would
simply have to do their best and that is fine).
This often gets brought up I believe when people talk about transgender
issues, however, they are both very different, in one case, it is
legitimately a physical issue, in the other it is a psychological issue
and not a physical one, in the cases where it is physically clear,
common sense should take over and correctly recognize mental illnesses
and correctly advise those people to use the correct bathroom which
corresponds to their physical gender (regardless of whether they feel
like a woman trapped in a mans body or not, they have a mans body, use
the men's bathroom).
I hope this has helped
God Bless
Thank you for reading
Josh
__________________
Jesus to St Faustina
You please Me most when you meditate on My Sorrowful Passion.
(Diary, 1512)
The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there.
(Diary, 1563)
We resemble God most when we forgive our neighbors. (Diary, 1148)
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:37 pm
|
 |
Forum Master
|
|
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 21,514
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
| =meltzerboy;13820446]My point is that these problems tend to work
themselves out over time. Just as people are usually not harmed by gays
who share the same bathroom with straights (which was once considered a
dangerous situation), they will not be harmed by transgenders. They may
feel uncomfortable at first, but people will get used to it.
|
Somehow, I'm not sure if a 13 yo girl will ever get used to sharing a locker room with a 58 year old man.
Quote:
| Although unisex bathrooms have been suggested and are even in existence
at least in one university (there is another thread on this), I'm not
quite ready for that. But I'm from the older generation and never
adapted to unisex hairstylists either (from the 1970's, IIRC).
|
I think some people may just want to avoid the headache in order to get on with life.
__________________
"The left is no longer liberal"-----Dave Rubin
"Social network censorship----SEE HOW FAR THEY GET WITH IT!!!!!" --------from Social Justice the Musical
"...censorship begins with me, but will end with you". --Milo Yiannapolous
Hate speech = free speech #1A #2A
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:39 pm
|
 |
Forum Master
|
|
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 21,514
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFerri48
It's not a red herring, it's a legitimate question if bathroom use is simply based on the genitalia.
|
Well, the proper Catholic thing to do would be to get some counseling/spiritual direction on the matter and go from there.
Some formation of conscience is required.
__________________
"The left is no longer liberal"-----Dave Rubin
"Social network censorship----SEE HOW FAR THEY GET WITH IT!!!!!" --------from Social Justice the Musical
"...censorship begins with me, but will end with you". --Milo Yiannapolous
Hate speech = free speech #1A #2A
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:40 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Has no one here ever left the country? Unisex bathrooms are all over the
world. Personally, I am happy when I see a toilet that I recognize.
I've been to places where I don't know how to use the facilities. This
is an American problem. Let's get over it. We'll be ok.
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:41 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperLuigi
Well, the proper Catholic thing to do would be to get some counseling/spiritual direction on the matter and go from there.
Some formation of conscience is required.
|
Really?
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:42 pm
|
 |
Forum Master
|
|
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 21,514
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
Has no one here ever left the country?
Unisex bathrooms are all over the world. Personally, I am happy when I
see a toilet that I recognize. I've been to places where I don't know
how to use the facilities. This is an American problem. Let's get over
it. We'll be ok.
|
I'm not personally opposed to unisex bathrooms, as they have other
advantages for disabled people and parents with small children of the
opposite gender.
But that doesn't I support someone deciding what gender they are just to be different and  .
Quote:
| This is an American problem. Let's get over it. We'll be ok.
|
Why? Because it's a progressive cause and should just automatically be accepted?
__________________
"The left is no longer liberal"-----Dave Rubin
"Social network censorship----SEE HOW FAR THEY GET WITH IT!!!!!" --------from Social Justice the Musical
"...censorship begins with me, but will end with you". --Milo Yiannapolous
Hate speech = free speech #1A #2A
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:45 pm
|
 |
Forum Master
|
|
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 21,514
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
Really?
|
Yes, really. Having an issue like that does not mean that one can
just sweep it under the rug and just expect everyone to support it.
EVERY Catholic and really every person needs to do some actual thinking and praying and if necessary, seek the proper guidance.
__________________
"The left is no longer liberal"-----Dave Rubin
"Social network censorship----SEE HOW FAR THEY GET WITH IT!!!!!" --------from Social Justice the Musical
"...censorship begins with me, but will end with you". --Milo Yiannapolous
Hate speech = free speech #1A #2A
|

Apr 11, '16, 7:46 pm
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Kasich: "I would not have signed the North Carolina Bathroom Law"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
Has no one here ever left the country?
Unisex bathrooms are all over the world. Personally, I am happy when I
see a toilet that I recognize. I've been to places where I don't know
how to use the facilities. This is an American problem. Let's get over
it. We'll be ok.
|
I always use the handicapped restroom when traveling on the French
highway. The men's and women's are the classic toilette de turk, a hole
in the ground with a grate over it. Even though I'm French, I never
learned how to use one of those thing properly, and they just seem very
inconvenient, especially for women. It's nuts. I really don't care if a
restroom is unisex as long as there's a door on the stall. As for kids,
someone should always be with them even if the men's and women's are
separate.
|
Apr 17, '16, 6:50 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Posts: 21,516
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
Right here.
He says it is only problematic to vote for a candidate who proposes
intrinsic evil if the Catholic voter does so primarily because of the
candidate's position on an intrinsic evil. But Catholics are to consider
issues (ending in an "s" means plural) along with a candidate's
character and ability to actually affect anything. Then make a choice of
which there are never easy ones.
"Yes, and I think that’s what “Faithful Citizenship” is saying. As a
disciple, as a citizen, you have to weigh issues, you have to consider
the character of candidates, what you think they will be able to do in
terms of affecting the society and the culture in which we live.
Clearly, the document is saying that to vote for someone who is
proposing actions that are intrinsically evil, because of their position
on those intrinsically evil acts, is certainly problematic for someone
who is a believer in Christ. You don’t believe in Christ and then vote
for a person simply, or primarily, because they hold a position that’s
contrary to the church. You have to take those positions into
consideration, and then make a choice. These are never easy choices."
He also says in regard to if there is consensus in the conference on
whether a pro-choice vote amounts to formal cooperation, "No, I’m sure
there isn’t. "
http://www.priestsforlife.org/magist...anas-synod.htm
|
Per Archbishop Burke, it is remote material cooperation to vote
for a candidate if you don't vote for them because of their position
supporting abortion if there are proportionate reasons, but as he says,
"What is a proportionate reason to justify favoring the taking of an
innocent, defenseless human life? And I just leave that to you as a
question. That's the question that has to be answered in your
conscience. What is the proportionate reason?"
This is what Bishop Kevin W. Vann and Bishop Kevin J. Farrell say in this letter regarding Faithful Citizenship:
Quote:
5. Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, in paragraphs 34 – 37,
addresses the question of whether is is morally permissible for a
Catholic to vote for a candidate who supports an intrinsic evil – even
when the voter does not agree with the candidate's position on that
evil. The only moral possibilities for a Catholic to be able to vote in
good conscience for a candidate who supports the intrinsic evil are the
following:
If both candidates running for office support abortion or
"abortion rights," a Catholic would be forced to then look at the other
important issues and through their vote try to limit the evil done; or,
If another intrinsic evil outweighs the evil of abortion. While this is sound moral reasoning, there
are no "truly grave moral" or "proportionate" reasons, singularly, or
combined, that could outweigh the millions of innocent human lives that
are directly killed by legal abortion each year.
To
vote for a candidate who supports the intrinsic evil of abortion or
"abortion rights" when there is a morally acceptable alternative would
be to cooperate in the evil – and, therefore, is morally impermissible.
|
http://www.jeffdodson.com/2008/11/02...cs-and-voting/
__________________
Human Life International helps to build the culture of life in more than "100 countries". Please help their mission: https://www.hli.org
|

Apr 17, '16, 6:53 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Abyssinia
|
Then why wouldn't the document just say that?
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:06 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
Prayer Warrior
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Posts: 21,516
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Then why wouldn't the document just say that?
|
I can't answer that question, but Bishop Vasa actually contributed to the Faithful Citizenship document and he said:
Quote:
| "When we were working on the document ‘Faithful Citizenship’, and the
issue of whether or not a person’s adamant pro-abortion position was a
disqualifying condition, the general sense was ‘yes that is a
disqualifying condition’."
|
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bi...s-faithful-cit
He discussions proportionate reasons in that article.
He had also said:
Quote:
"The document does not say, for instance, that it is just fine to vote
for a pro-abortion candidate as long as one votes for that candidate
only because of his or her stand on other important social issues," he
wrote. "Casting a vote, even for reasons other than the candidate’s
pro-abortion position, is still casting a vote for the preservation of
‘a legal system which violates the basic right to life.’"
He compared support for a candidate who supports keeping abortion legal
to backing a candidate who vows to institute a program of genocide
against a minority group or "an aggressive program of torture to root
out crime, violence and terrorism in this country."
"Just as a vote for a genocidal maniac is a vote for genocide and a vote
for the avowed torturer is a vote for torture … so a vote for a
promoter of abortion, when there is another less evil alternative, is a
vote for abortion," Bishop Vasa said.
|
http://www.nzcatholic.org.nz/2008/10...mns-statements
__________________
Human Life International helps to build the culture of life in more than "100 countries". Please help their mission: https://www.hli.org
Last edited by _Abyssinia; Apr 17, '16 at 7:17 pm.
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:18 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Abyssinia
|
I find it odd that Faithful Citizenship wouldn't say that then. It
seems like it could be much shorter if it said, well, we care about
other issues, but there is no proportional reason not to vote for the
pro-life candidate, so you should vote for the pro-life candidate.
Bishop Kicalas suggests there is more to it than that.
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:25 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,022
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peccavi
Anti-socialist seems to be a very US
problem Here in Europe Catholics have no problem voting socialist - in
fact many Socialists elected to European parliaments are Catholic. US
Catholics do seem to me to have a different more narrow view of
Catholicism than those Catholics in Europe and South America. Catholics
are far less politically polarised in these continents.
|
I don't know but I wonder if you have possibly hit onto something
here with your analysis. Maybe those US Catholics whose politics are
Republican or lean conservative, such as many on this forum, and who
tend to vote for like-minded candidates, have narrowed the view. It's at
least something to ponder.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:29 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,022
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
I find it odd that Faithful Citizenship
wouldn't say that then. It seems like it could be much shorter if it
said, well, we care about other issues, but there is no proportional
reason not to vote for the pro-life candidate, so you should vote for
the pro-life candidate. Bishop Kicalas suggests there is more to it than
that.
|
Much shorter.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:31 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,022
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
First of all, no one ever says they are
"pro-abortion," rather they frame it as "pro-choice." It is possible for
a person to be against abortion, but "pro-choice" -- I ran into those
types when I was out campaigning for Democrat Ellen McCormack
(anti-abortion platform) in 1976. At least some understood that pushing
women out into back alley abortions was harmful not only to the baby but
also to the woman. I did know a couple of women who nearly bled to
death circa 1965.
On the other hand, this label "pro-life" that people take on for
themselves when they have no concern at all about their participation of
wiping out life on earth thru environmental harms, etc. is a misnomer.
They might be "anti-abortion," but they don't really seem to care about
life or killing people.
|
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:31 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
I don't know but I wonder if you have
possibly hit onto something here with your analysis. Maybe those US
Catholics whose politics are Republican or lean conservative, such as
many on this forum, and who tend to vote for like-minded candidates,
have narrowed the view. It's at least something to ponder.
|
Two reasons:
1) Abortion is not an issue in Europe. Most European countries do not
have politicians that do support the 'right to choose.' As such, there
is not an issue that challenges Catholics to make a tough decision
between two poor choices.
2) The Evangelical community has taken on the Republicans as their
adapted political home. As such, you see the skewing of Christ's
teachings to support Republican views on economic policy or waging war
instead of challenging them. Clearly, this community in the past has
used their religion to support slavery, segregation and racism, so this
is not a new phenomena. This has trickled into the Catholic community
that refuses to see torture as torture and unjust wars as unjust wars.
|

Apr 17, '16, 7:38 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
Much shorter.
|
I know. It's like some are claiming that the vast majority of the
document is a distraction from its clear, underlying purpose that the
only issue that matters is to vote for the pro-life politician. It's
like the Wizard of Oz.
|

Apr 18, '16, 12:31 am
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
First of all, no one ever says they are
"pro-abortion," rather they frame it as "pro-choice." It is possible for
a person to be against abortion, but "pro-choice" -- I ran into those
types when I was out campaigning for Democrat Ellen McCormack
(anti-abortion platform) in 1976. At least some understood that pushing
women out into back alley abortions was harmful not only to the baby but
also to the woman. I did know a couple of women who nearly bled to
death circa 1965.
On the other hand, this label "pro-life" that people take on for
themselves when they have no concern at all about their participation of
wiping out life on earth thru environmental harms, etc. is a misnomer.
They might be "anti-abortion," but they don't really seem to care about
life or killing people.
|
Great post!
Those who are pro-choice usually don't mind if no one ever has an
abortion. They just don't want to see women being butchered along with
their child, or more likely, they feel the choice is the woman's to
make, along with her family, doctor, and faith leader.
I've seen many so-called pro-life persons who don't give a hoot about
life once the child is born. I used to call them "pro-birth," but that
seems derogatory, so I stick to pro-choice and anti-abortion now.
I do not personally believe in abortion, however, I do believe, under
the US Constitution, it should be legal in the US. I do think the
individual states have a right to prohibit abortion, however, but I
don't think that's going to happen. Like Pope Paul VI, I believe it is
contraceptives that ushered in the "culture of death," a term coined by
St. Pope JP II, and I don't believe contraception is going to lose its
hold on people of childbearing age. I know many Catholics who contracept
and feel their families are better for it. I know Catholics who say if
they did not contracept, they would abort, and these are Catholics who
are looked at as "good" Catholics. They are not lapsed Catholics.
Last edited by Lily Bernans; Apr 18, '16 at 12:41 am.
|

Apr 18, '16, 12:34 am
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
Thanks Lily but your posts are most helpful. I honestly just don't understand what is so difficult about this to grasp. 
|
I don't see why possible "remote material cooperation with evil,
at worst," is so hard to understand, either, Sy. It's something we all
do on a daily basis. Sometimes we aren't aware of it, e.g., we might buy
a garment from a sweatshop in China, and sometimes we are, e.g., we
refuse to give up our trendy Starbucks designer coffees.
I don't think any president, of any party, in the history of the US, has
attempted to force women to abort. Some posters act like Hillary and
Bernie and maybe Trump would be pulling pregnant women off the streets
and driving them to abortion clinics themselves. They wouldn't, as you
know.
As for Supreme Court justices, we just can't predict what they'll do. I
don't think this forum would have guessed a Repub. SC would have upheld
Roe v Wade and PP v Casey or that abortions would decline under Obama,
but such is the case.
|

Apr 18, '16, 1:45 am
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: January 21, 2013
Posts: 11,614
Religion: other
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
I know many Catholics who contracept and
feel their families are better for it. I know Catholics who say if they
did not contracept, they would abort, and these are Catholics who are
looked at as "good" Catholics. They are not lapsed Catholics.
|
Is it still a mortal sin for a Roman Catholic to contracept, or
has that rule been changed? I know that in the Eastern Orthodox Church, a
priest might make exceptions under certain conditions, for example, if
the married couple already has four children and are experiencing
financial difficulties.
|

Apr 18, '16, 4:21 am
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 1,361
Religion: Byzantine Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
Great post!
Those who are pro-choice usually don't mind if no one ever has an
abortion. They just don't want to see women being butchered along with
their child, or more likely, they feel the choice is the woman's to
make, along with her family, doctor, and faith leader.
I've seen many so-called pro-life persons who don't give a hoot about
life once the child is born. I used to call them "pro-birth," but that
seems derogatory, so I stick to pro-choice and anti-abortion now.
I do not personally believe in abortion, however, I do believe, under
the US Constitution, it should be legal in the US. I do think the
individual states have a right to prohibit abortion, however, but I
don't think that's going to happen. Like Pope Paul VI, I believe it is
contraceptives that ushered in the "culture of death," a term coined by
St. Pope JP II, and I don't believe contraception is going to lose its
hold on people of childbearing age. I know many Catholics who contracept
and feel their families are better for it. I know Catholics who say if
they did not contracept, they would abort, and these are Catholics who
are looked at as "good" Catholics. They are not lapsed Catholics.
|
Quote:
Laws which authorize and promote abortion and euthanasia are therefore
radically opposed not only to the good of the individual but also to the
common good; as such they are completely lacking in authentic juridical
validity. Disregard for the right to life, precisely because it leads
to the killing of the person whom society exists to serve, is what most
directly conflicts with the possibility of achieving the common good.
Consequently, a civil law authorizing abortion or euthanasia ceases by
that very fact to be a true, morally binding civil law.
Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to
legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws;
instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by
conscientious objection.
|
-- Pope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life)
Those who are Pro-Death are nobody's friend.
__________________
"It's a free country; you can say whatever you want."
--Old American Saying
(U.S. Postal Service stamp-- from 1977 Americana series which extols
freedom of speech and features a Speaker's Stand decorated with an
American Flag shield.)
|

Apr 18, '16, 4:39 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
He would have given a very different answer to the question if you couldn't.
|
Where does he say it is licit for a Catholic to vote for
pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life alternative is available ?
Again you're asking us to depend upon your personal opinion of what the
bishop "meant " rather than what he actually said .
|

Apr 18, '16, 4:48 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
Right here.
He says it is only problematic to vote for a candidate who proposes
intrinsic evil if the Catholic voter does so primarily because of the
candidate's position on an intrinsic evil. But Catholics are to consider
issues (ending in an "s" means plural) along with a candidate's
character and ability to actually affect anything. Then make a choice of
which there are never easy ones.
"Yes, and I think that’s what “Faithful Citizenship” is saying. As a
disciple, as a citizen, you have to weigh issues, you have to consider
the character of candidates, what you think they will be able to do in
terms of affecting the society and the culture in which we live.
Clearly, the document is saying that to vote for someone who is
proposing actions that are intrinsically evil, because of their position
on those intrinsically evil acts, is certainly problematic for someone
who is a believer in Christ. You don’t believe in Christ and then vote
for a person simply, or primarily, because they hold a position that’s
contrary to the church. You have to take those positions into
consideration, and then make a choice. These are never easy choices."
He also says in regard to if there is consensus in the conference on
whether a pro-choice vote amounts to formal cooperation, "No, I’m sure
there isn’t. "
http://www.priestsforlife.org/magist...anas-synod.htm
|
So once again we are asked to ignore the clear concise quotes of
numerous members of the magisterium and church documents and rely
instead upon individuals Catholics personal interpretation of what a
bishop really "meant" when asked about a couple paragraphs in a USCCB
documentv Can you single member of the magisterium that explicitly says
it is licit for Catholics to vote for pro-abortion candidate if a more
pro-life alternative is available ?
And of course no one disagrees that voting for a pro-abortion candidate
when his opponent is more pro-abortion than they are is not formal
corporation with evil As Archbishop Chaput states such a vote is not
voting for the lesser of two evils- it is voting to lessen evil .
|
|
Apr 18, '16, 5:00 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: June 26, 2005
Posts: 10,534
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
Where does he say it is licit for a
Catholic to vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life
alternative is available ? Again you're asking us to depend upon your
personal opinion of what the bishop "meant " rather than what he
actually said .
|
What are the proportionate reasons that allowed Catholics to vote
for Mitt Romney vs Virgil Goode in the last election? Can you cite some
of the hierarchy pointing out these reasons?
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:02 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
I find it odd that Faithful Citizenship
wouldn't say that then. It seems like it could be much shorter if it
said, well, we care about other issues, but there is no proportional
reason not to vote for the pro-life candidate, so you should vote for
the pro-life candidate. Bishop Kicalas suggests there is more to it than
that.
|
It's odd that that a Catholic will believe that Faithful
Citizenship is the sum total of all Catholic teaching . Regardless of
how many quotes from members of the magisterium or church documents we
provide the reply as always " my personal interpretation of Faithful
Citizenship differs with that ." Surely if it was licit for Catholic to
vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life alternative was
available somebody in the Magestrium would've said so directly. You know
something clear and concise like this:
"No, you can never vote for someone who favors absolutely what's called
the 'right to choice' of a woman to destroy human life in her womb, or
the right to a procured abortion.
"You may in some circumstances where you don't have any candidate who is
proposing to eliminate all abortion, choose the candidate who will most
limit this grave evil in our country, but you could never justify
voting for a candidate who not only does not want to limit abortion but
believes that it should be available to everyone"
Cardinal Burke
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:12 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
Where does he say it is licit for a
Catholic to vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life
alternative is available ? Again you're asking us to depend upon your
personal opinion of what the bishop "meant " rather than what he
actually said .
|
From the article,
Interviewer: If I’m hearing you correctly, you’re saying that for a
Catholic who wants to approach his or her vote in three weeks with the
mind of the church, it’s not a slam-dunk which way that vote should go.
Is that right?
Bishop Kicanas: Yes, and I think that’s what “Faithful Citizenship” is saying.
I would think it would be a slam dunk if Bishop Kicanas held your view.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:18 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
It's odd that that a Catholic will
believe that Faithful Citizenship is the sum total of all Catholic
teaching . Regardless of how many quotes from members of the magisterium
or church documents we provide the reply as always " my personal
interpretation of Faithful Citizenship differs with that ." Surely if it
was licit for Catholic to vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more
pro-life alternative was available somebody in the Magestrium would've
said so directly. You know something clear and concise like this:
"No, you can never vote for someone who favors absolutely what's called
the 'right to choice' of a woman to destroy human life in her womb, or
the right to a procured abortion.
"You may in some circumstances where you don't have any candidate who is
proposing to eliminate all abortion, choose the candidate who will most
limit this grave evil in our country, but you could never justify
voting for a candidate who not only does not want to limit abortion but
believes that it should be available to everyone"
Cardinal Burke
|
It would seem that Bishop Kicanas does not agree with your
interpretation of Church teaching or he would have answered the
questions in the posted interview differently. He seems to be a strong
supporter of the Forming Consciences document.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:19 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkcat_14
What are the proportionate reasons that
allowed Catholics to vote for Mitt Romney vs Virgil Goode in the last
election? Can you cite some of the hierarchy pointing out these reasons?
|
If you think Catholics are required to throw their vote away on
non-viable candidates then you should do so .But as Bishop Kicanas
points out voting often requires us to make tough choices and one of
those would be to choose a viable candidate over one who is more in line
with Catholic teaching on abortion but has no chance whatsoever to win .
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:23 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
It would seem that Bishop Kicanas does
not agree with your interpretation of Church teaching or he would have
answered the questions in the posted interview differently. He seems to
be a strong supporter of the Forming Consciences document.
|
Once again you're asking us to rely upon your personal
interpretation of what Bishop Kicanas "meant" Can you point out a single
instance where Bishop Kicanas or any other member of the magisterium
specifically stated it was licit for a Catholic to vote for pro-abortion
candidate when a more pro-life alternative was available ?
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:23 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Posts: 1,238
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph3
Socialism is always bad. It does not make a difference if it is democratic or not.
|
Will you be burning your social security checks later in life?
It be rather hypocritical for you to benefit monetarily from a socialist program.
Better not use Medicaid or Medicare either.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:24 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
If you think Catholics are required to
throw their vote away on non-viable candidates then you should do so
.But as Bishop Kicanas points out voting often requires us to make tough
choices and one of those would be to choose a viable candidate over one
who is more in line with Catholic teaching on abortion but has no
chance whatsoever to win .
|
I can understand StinkCat's concern though. According to Bishop
Vasas, "Just as a vote for a genocidal maniac is a vote for genocide and
a vote for the avowed torturer is a vote for torture … so a vote for a
promoter of abortion, when there is another less evil alternative, is a
vote for abortion."
So, if you vote for a major party candidate, you are either voting to
support abortion or voting to support torture and unjust wars. I can see
wanting to support neither.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:26 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Posts: 1,238
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
If you think Catholics are required to
throw their vote away on non-viable candidates then you should do so
.But as Bishop Kicanas points out voting often requires us to make tough
choices and one of those would be to choose a viable candidate over one
who is more in line with Catholic teaching on abortion but has no
chance whatsoever to win .
|
Voting for "the lesser if two evils" is capitulation, pure and simple.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:27 am
|
|
Veteran Member
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Posts: 10,604
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
Once again you're asking us to rely upon
your personal interpretation of what Bishop Kicanas "meant" Can you
point out a single instance where Bishop Kicanas or any other member of
the magisterium specifically stated it was licit for a Catholic to vote
for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life alternative was
available ?
|
It is so discouraging to see people interpret what a person, in
this case a bishop, means when he makes a statement. Seems like reading
into the statement what one wants to hear. I have always been taught
that abortion is a mortal sin and to cooperate in that sin is, in
itself, a sin. When did the teachings of the church change?
__________________
 Praying for all CAF intentions.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:27 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
Once again you're asking us to rely upon
your personal interpretation of what Bishop Kicanas "meant" Can you
point out a single instance where Bishop Kicanas or any other member of
the magisterium specifically stated it was licit for a Catholic to vote
for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life alternative was
available ?
|
Of course, I don't want any reader to rely on my personal
interpretation as I'm sure you wouldn't want any reader to rely on your
personal interpretation. I think everyone should read all the resources
available to them including the Forming Consciences document and what
individual bishops and decide for themselves what they mean.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:31 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mary bobo
It is so discouraging to see people
interpret what a person, in this case a bishop, means when he makes a
statement. Seems like reading into the statement what one wants to hear.
I have always been taught that abortion is a mortal sin and to
cooperate in that sin is, in itself, a sin. When did the teachings of
the church change?
|
It is not clear that voting for a pro-choice politician is
material cooperation with evil and hence a sin. But I do agree, many
around here do read into a statement what they want to hear.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:33 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: June 26, 2005
Posts: 10,534
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
If you think Catholics are required to throw their vote away on non-viable candidates then you should do so
|
I am not asking for your opinion, but for Church teaching on the
issue. Cite some documents. You have stated before that there are no
proportionate reasons for voting for a pro-abortion candidate when a
pro-life candidate is available.
In addition, voting for Romney was throwing your vote away. He had no
chance and Catholics help put him there in the first place. Maybe if
Catholics voting for pro-life candidates in the primaries, then we
wouldn't be faced with the choice of voting for pro-abortion candidates.
Quote:
| .But as Bishop Kicanas points out voting often requires us to make tough
choices and one of those would be to choose a viable candidate over one
who is more in line with Catholic teaching on abortion but has no
chance whatsoever to win .
|
So there are proportionate reasons for voting for a pro-abortion candidate?
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:36 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Posts: 1,238
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
It is not clear that voting for a
pro-choice politician is material cooperation with evil and hence a sin.
But I do agree, many around here do read into a statement what they
want to hear.
|
And it begs the question of the morality of voting for trump as
well. Would voting for trump, who supports torture and summary execution
of the families of "suspected" terrorists not be material cooperation
with evil?
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:47 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtauke
And it begs the question of the morality
of voting for trump as well. Would voting for trump, who supports
torture and summary execution of the families of "suspected" terrorists
not be material cooperation with evil?
|
I don't know. But, by Bishop Vasas' statement, you would clearly be a supporter of torture and summary execution of families.
Apr 18, '16, 5:53 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Posts: 1,238
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
I don't know. But, by Bishop Vasas' statement, you would clearly be a supporter of torture and summary execution of families.
|
Exactly.
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:56 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkcat_14
I am not asking for your opinion, but for
Church teaching on the issue. Cite some documents. You have stated
before that there are no proportionate reasons for voting for a
pro-abortion candidate when a pro-life candidate is available.
In addition, voting for Romney was throwing your vote away. He had no
chance and Catholics help put him there in the first place. Maybe if
Catholics voting for pro-life candidates in the primaries, then we
wouldn't be faced with the choice of voting for pro-abortion candidates.
So there are proportionate reasons for voting for a pro-abortion candidate?
|
As always it is best to let' a member of the Magestrium to explain:
"Consider the case of a Catholic voter who must choose between three
candidates: candidate (A, Kerry) who is completely for
abortion-on-demand, candidate (B, Bush) who is in favor of very limited
abortion, i.e., in favor of greatly restricting abortion and candidate
(C, Peroutka), a candidate who is completely against abortion but who is
universally recognized as being unelectable.
"The Catholic voter cannot vote for candidate (A, Kerry) because that
would be formal cooperation in the sin of abortion if that candidate
were to be elected and assist in passing legislation, which would remove
restrictions on, abortion-on-demand.
"The Catholic can vote for candidate (C, Peroutka) but that will
probably only help ensure the election of candidate (A, Kerry).
Therefore the Catholic voter has a proportionate reason to vote for
candidate (B, Bush) since his vote may help to ensure the defeat of
candidate (A, Kerry) and may result in the saving of some innocent human
lives if candidate (B, Bush) is elected and introduces legislation
restricting abortion-on-demand. In such a case, the Catholic voter would
have chosen the lesser of two evils, which is morally permissible under
these circumstances."
Bishop Rene Gracida
|

Apr 18, '16, 5:59 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
As always it is best to let' a member of the Magestrium to explain:
"Consider the case of a Catholic voter who must choose between three
candidates: candidate (A, Kerry) who is completely for
abortion-on-demand, candidate (B, Bush) who is in favor of very limited
abortion, i.e., in favor of greatly restricting abortion and candidate
(C, Peroutka), a candidate who is completely against abortion but who is
universally recognized as being unelectable.
"The Catholic voter cannot vote for candidate (A, Kerry) because that
would be formal cooperation in the sin of abortion if that candidate
were to be elected and assist in passing legislation, which would remove
restrictions on, abortion-on-demand.
"The Catholic can vote for candidate (C, Peroutka) but that will
probably only help ensure the election of candidate (A, Kerry).
Therefore the Catholic voter has a proportionate reason to vote for
candidate (B, Bush) since his vote may help to ensure the defeat of
candidate (A, Kerry) and may result in the saving of some innocent human
lives if candidate (B, Bush) is elected and introduces legislation
restricting abortion-on-demand. In such a case, the Catholic voter would
have chosen the lesser of two evils, which is morally permissible under
these circumstances."
Bishop Rene Gracida
|
Since President Bush was that election, then we can measure how
many innocent lives were saved by legislation restricting abortion on
demand. What? No legislation. Well, at least we got some unjust wars and
torture out of the deal.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:03 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: June 26, 2005
Posts: 10,534
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Since President Bush was that election,
then we can measure how many innocent lives were saved by legislation
restricting abortion on demand. What? No legislation. Well, at least we
got some unjust wars and torture out of the deal.
|
While one could vote for Bush, there was no moral obligation to
vote for Bush. While one may vote for most republicans, not on their own
merits, but because they are a lessor evil. One is not morally
obligated to vote for a republican.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:04 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkcat_14
While one could vote for Bush, there was
no moral obligation to vote for Bush. While one may vote for most
republicans, not on their own merits, but because they are a lessor
evil. One is not morally obligated to vote for a republican.
|
Was he the lessor evil?
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:07 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Of course, I don't want any reader to
rely on my personal interpretation as I'm sure you wouldn't want any
reader to rely on your personal interpretation. I think everyone should
read all the resources available to them including the Forming
Consciences document and what individual bishops and decide for
themselves what they mean.
|
Unfortunately many do this and then come into Catholic forums and
continually mistate Catholic teaching to buttress their personal
political views. Lest other Catholics be misled it necessary to refute
them with direct quotes from members of the Magestruim and Vatican
documents. A Catholic simply cannot vote for pro-abortion candidate
unless their opponent is more pro-abortion than they are. I have yet to
see anyone be able to refute this simple statement with anything other
than their personal interpretation of a few linesc of a USCCB document
and an interview with a Bishop where the assertion is we are not to look
at what he says but what he doesn't say
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:08 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkcat_14
While one could vote for Bush, there was
no moral obligation to vote for Bush. While one may vote for most
republicans, not on their own merits, but because they are a lessor
evil. One is not morally obligated to vote for a republican.
|
No one ever said we are morally obligated to vote for Republican. Party is totally irrelevant .
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:10 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 5,182
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph3
Socialism is always bad. It does not make a difference if it is democratic or not.
|
Of course bad for the billionaires. They have to start paying taxes
What I've never been able to figure out is why would a person need to
have so much money? How many yachts can they be sailing on at the same
time?
Oh yeah, once they have the money, then they need to buy elections and
politicians so they can get them to dismantle the regs -- EPA, worker
wages and safety, etc. So it's either about making more money or so they
can kill and harm at will with impunity. Or maybe it's just like a game
to them and they want to win....like Monopoly.
__________________
"The Lord God lives before whom I stand."
-- 1 Kings 17:1
"Preach the Gospel at all times and if necessary use words."
-- St. Francis of Assisi
"I want to spend my Heaven doing good on Earth."
-- St. Therese of the Child Jesus
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:13 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 5,182
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Gravis poll results for NY primary - Bernie lags Hilary by only 6% with a 2.9% margin of error. See http://www.oann.com/pollny/
__________________
"The Lord God lives before whom I stand."
-- 1 Kings 17:1
"Preach the Gospel at all times and if necessary use words."
-- St. Francis of Assisi
"I want to spend my Heaven doing good on Earth."
-- St. Therese of the Child Jesus
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:14 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Since President Bush was that election,
then we can measure how many innocent lives were saved by legislation
restricting abortion on demand. What? No legislation. Well, at least we
got some unjust wars and torture out of the deal.
|
His reinstitution of the Mexico City policy undoubtedly saved
thousands and thousands of lives of unborn children in Third World
countries . He also signed the partial-birth abortion law , the first
restriction on abortion passed since Roe was opposed . A grand total of
three terrorist were water boarded during the Bush administration . But
then again if people Really think Bush supports unjust wars and torture I
suggest they not vote for him in the 2016 election
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:19 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
|
Interesting. If Sanders can start gaining some of the superdelegates it could make for an interesting convention
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:26 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 5,182
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
|
Also on general election polls, Sanders does much better than Clinton against any of the Republican candidates:
For Sanders v. Trump see: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ders-5565.html
The general election polls for other match-ups are linked on that page.
__________________
"The Lord God lives before whom I stand."
-- 1 Kings 17:1
"Preach the Gospel at all times and if necessary use words."
-- St. Francis of Assisi
"I want to spend my Heaven doing good on Earth."
-- St. Therese of the Child Jesus
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:29 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
Of course bad for the billionaires. They have to start paying taxes
What I've never been able to figure out is why would a person need to
have so much money? How many yachts can they be sailing on at the same
time?
Oh yeah, once they have the money, then they need to buy elections and
politicians so they can get them to dismantle the regs -- EPA, worker
wages and safety, etc. So it's either about making more money or so they
can kill and harm at will with impunity. Or maybe it's just like a game
to them and they want to win....like Monopoly.
|
I often wonder about how much money is needed, too. I think that
once they make a tremendous amount of money the thrill is gone. The next
thrill comes from power. They use all that money to gain power. Nothing
is ever going to make them completely happy.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:31 am
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
I often wonder about how much money is
needed, too. I think that once they make a tremendous amount of money
the thrill is gone. The next thrill comes from power. They use all that
money to gain power. Nothing is ever going to make them completely
happy.
|
The way I see it, the more money I have the more I can help other
people who are very needy, and animals as well. I'd buy some nice things
- a house, a boat, some businesses, but I'd use the bulk of the money
to help others, especially the homeless, and to help homeless animals.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:32 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: December 19, 2013
Posts: 1,690
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
The way I see it, the more money I have the more I can help other people who are very needy, and animals as well.
|
So many of these power brokers don't think like that. Imagine if they did!
|
Apr 18, '16, 6:32 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by gilliam
I think we would describe the early Christian communities as socialism
|
No, we wouldn't. The early Church shared in charity their goods
among themselves freely, without coercion or force. This is NOT
socialism.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:34 am
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
So many of these power brokers don't think like that. Imagine if they did!
|
I know they don't. Sad! I'm not into power, though. The only person I'd like to control is me! LOL
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:42 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
Great post!
Those who are pro-choice usually don't mind if no one ever has an
abortion. They just don't want to see women being butchered along with
their child, or more likely, they feel the choice is the woman's to
make, along with her family, doctor, and faith leader.
|
No one has the right to "choose" to kill an innocent person. A Christian cannot support such a "choice".
Quote:
| I've seen many so-called pro-life persons who don't give a hoot about
life once the child is born. I used to call them "pro-birth," but that
seems derogatory, so I stick to pro-choice and anti-abortion now.
|
More justifications you use to excuse your support of intrinsic
evil. Paint those who are working to protect life as monsters, so that
you can continue to oppose Church teaching.
Quote:
| I do not personally believe in abortion,
|
You PERSONALLY want it to remain legal, so YES, you DO personally believe in abortion.
Quote:
| I know many Catholics who contracept and feel their families are better for it.
|
Their feelings are wrong, and they are in mortal sin. A Christian
should practice charity to such people and warn them they are putting
their soul in jeopardy of damnation.
Quote:
| I know Catholics who say if they did not contracept, they would abort,
and these are Catholics who are looked at as "good" Catholics. They are
not lapsed Catholics.
|
They most certainly ARE lapsed Catholics. They have rejected
Church teaching, so they are lapsed. They may be attending Mass, but
they reject the Christian faith. And you can really see it in what they
say, that if they weren't sinning by using contraception, they would
instead sin by killing their child. Shows how perverted the conscience
can become when one rejects even one Church teaching.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:46 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnvinc
Of course bad for the billionaires. They have to start paying taxes
What I've never been able to figure out is why would a person need to
have so much money? How many yachts can they be sailing on at the same
time?
Oh yeah, once they have the money, then they need to buy elections and
politicians so they can get them to dismantle the regs -- EPA, worker
wages and safety, etc. So it's either about making more money or so they
can kill and harm at will with impunity. Or maybe it's just like a game
to them and they want to win....like Monopoly.
|
The "special" or "elite" class in socialized countries are always
protected. Political leaders always promise they will punish the "evil"
rich, but rarely do it.
And socialist countries are the worst polluters of the world. You'd
think someone who actually cared about the planet would care about that
fact.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:50 am
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz912
No one has the right to "choose" to kill an innocent person. A Christian cannot support such a "choice".
More justifications you use to excuse your support of intrinsic evil.
Paint those who are working to protect life as monsters, so that you can
continue to oppose Church teaching.
You PERSONALLY want it to remain legal, so YES, you DO personally believe in abortion.
Their feelings are wrong, and they are in mortal sin. A Christian should
practice charity to such people and warn them they are putting their
soul in jeopardy of damnation.
They most certainly ARE lapsed Catholics. They have rejected Church
teaching, so they are lapsed. They may be attending Mass, but they
reject the Christian faith. And you can really see it in what they say,
that if they weren't sinning by using contraception, they would instead
sin by killing their child. Shows how perverted the conscience can
become when one rejects even one Church teaching.
|
Justice Scalia thought as I do, that abortion should be legal in
the US, and it was up to the individual states to prohibit it. I trust
his judgment over yours, no offense meant, and believe he was an expert
in constitutional law.
Please do not tell me what I believe. I do not believe in abortion. One
has to separate the moral from the legal. Blame the Founding Fathers who
wrote the Constitution. I do not support abortion on demand.
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:53 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 5,182
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph3
Socialism is always bad. It does not make a difference if it is democratic or not.
|
Sanders is for the Nordic Model of Socialism -- see Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model
"The Nordic model (also called Nordic capitalism or Nordic social
democracy) refers to the economic and social policies common to the
Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland and Sweden). This
includes a combination of free market capitalism with a comprehensive
welfare state and collective bargaining at the national level.
Although there are significant differences among the Nordic countries,
they all share some common traits. These include support for a
"universalist" welfare state aimed specifically at enhancing individual
autonomy and promoting social mobility; a corporatist system involving a
tripartite arrangement where representatives of labor and employers
negotiate wages and labor market policy mediated by the government; and a
commitment to widespread private ownership, free markets and free
trade."
However, even if Bernie were to become president, it is unlikely that he
would be able to get the US to go that far. It would just be great if
he could help (with our support) bring about a more just and healthy
society that would reduce harms and killing of people.
Maybe, since he is such a great fan of Pope Francis and Catholic social
teaching, he might even do things to help reduce abortion in a greater
way than what the Republican candidates plan to do -- push it into the
back alleys and down to Mexico, and if the babies get born, let them
fend for themselves on the streets.
__________________
"The Lord God lives before whom I stand."
-- 1 Kings 17:1
"Preach the Gospel at all times and if necessary use words."
-- St. Francis of Assisi
"I want to spend my Heaven doing good on Earth."
-- St. Therese of the Child Jesus
|

Apr 18, '16, 6:57 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 5,182
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz912
The "special" or "elite" class in
socialized countries are always protected. Political leaders always
promise they will punish the "evil" rich, but rarely do it.
And socialist countries are the worst polluters of the world. You'd
think someone who actually cared about the planet would care about that
fact.
|
My understanding is that Germany, UK, and Nordic countries are
somewhat better on the environment than the US, but maybe you know
something I don't know.
However, Bernie is by far the best environmentalist candidate. Trump and
Cruz are for killing us all out thru environmental harms. They are
exceedingly terrible, esp Cruz (let's face it Trump really doesn't know
much about anything, but Cruz does).
__________________
"The Lord God lives before whom I stand."
-- 1 Kings 17:1
"Preach the Gospel at all times and if necessary use words."
-- St. Francis of Assisi
"I want to spend my Heaven doing good on Earth."
-- St. Therese of the Child Jesus
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:10 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
I find it odd that Faithful Citizenship
wouldn't say that then. It seems like it could be much shorter if it
said, well, we care about other issues, but there is no proportional
reason not to vote for the pro-life candidate, so you should vote for
the pro-life candidate. Bishop Kicalas suggests there is more to it than
that.
|
It's odd that that a Catholic will believe that Faithful
Citizenship is the sum total of all Catholic teaching . Regardless of
how many quotes from members of the magisterium or church documents we
provide the reply as always " my personal interpretation of Faithful
Citizenship differs with that ." Surely if it was licit for Catholic to
vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more pro-life alternative was
available somebody in the Magestrium would've said so directly. You know
something clear and concise like this:
"No, you can never vote for someone who favors absolutely what's called
the 'right to choice' of a woman to destroy human life in her womb, or
the right to a procured abortion.
"You may in some circumstances where you don't have any candidate who is
proposing to eliminate all abortion, choose the candidate who will most
limit this grave evil in our country, but you could never justify
voting for a candidate who not only does not want to limit abortion but
believes that it should be available to everyone"
Cardinal Burke
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:15 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 26,596
Religion: Jewish
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtauke
Will you be burning your social security checks later in life?
It be rather hypocritical for you to benefit monetarily from a socialist program.
Better not use Medicaid or Medicare either.
|
Yes, an anti-socialist is someone who doesn't yet need some of the
benefits that the government provides. When they do need any of the
so-called entitlements, they magically support socialist programs.
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:16 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
Justice Scalia thought as I do, that
abortion should be legal in the US, and it was up to the individual
states to prohibit it. I trust his judgment over yours, no offense
meant, and believe he was an expert in constitutional law.
Please do not tell me what I believe. I do not believe in abortion. One
has to separate the moral from the legal. Blame the Founding Fathers who
wrote the Constitution. I do not support abortion on demand.
|
Do You trust his judgment over the teachings of the holy Catholic Church? We are required to oppose unjust laws
The “separation of Church and state” does not mean — and it can never
mean — separating our Catholic faith from our public witness, our
political choices and our political actions. That kind of separation
would require Christians to deny who we are; to repudiate Jesus when he
commands us to be “leaven in the world” and to “make disciples of all
nations.” That kind of radical separation steals the moral content of a
society. It’s the equivalent of telling a married man that he can’t act
married in public. Of course, he can certainly do that, but he won’t
stay married.
Archbishop CharlescChaput
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:18 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
The way I see it, the more money I have
the more I can help other people who are very needy, and animals as
well. I'd buy some nice things - a house, a boat, some businesses, but
I'd use the bulk of the money to help others, especially the homeless,
and to help homeless animals.
|
You don't Need money to help the poor and needy. All it takes his time and will
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:25 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: June 26, 2005
Posts: 10,534
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltzerboy
Yes, an anti-socialist is someone who
doesn't yet need some of the benefits that the government provides. When
they do need any of the so-called entitlements, they magically support
socialist programs.
|
It is not just needing social programs, it is wanting them. There
are plenty of people who don't need social security and medicare, but
few turn them down. If fact, we see people jumping through hoops to
redefine them as something other than socialist programs.
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:32 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
It's odd that that a Catholic will
believe that Faithful Citizenship is the sum total of all Catholic
teaching . Regardless of how many quotes from members of the magisterium
or church documents we provide the reply as always " my personal
interpretation of Faithful Citizenship differs with that ." Surely if it
was licit for Catholic to vote for pro-abortion candidate when a more
pro-life alternative was available somebody in the Magestrium would've
said so directly. You know something clear and concise like this:
"No, you can never vote for someone who favors absolutely what's called
the 'right to choice' of a woman to destroy human life in her womb, or
the right to a procured abortion.
"You may in some circumstances where you don't have any candidate who is
proposing to eliminate all abortion, choose the candidate who will most
limit this grave evil in our country, but you could never justify
voting for a candidate who not only does not want to limit abortion but
believes that it should be available to everyone"
Cardinal Burke
|
Again, the Faithful Citizenship guide would be much shorter than.
After all, Cardinal Burke has summarized all of Catholic voting into a
single issue and you could put that into a business card and hand it
out.
I don't think I am wrong to think that a majority of bishops want us to
think about a variety of issues based on the guide and the comments of
Bishop Kicanas who said about voters seeking Catholic guidance:
"I think they’ve been helped greatly by the bishops’ document on forming
consciences. [The document is titled “Faithful Citizenship.”] I think
helping people to understand the document is important, because what you
hear from people is that it’s too dense, we don’t understand it, it’s
too complex, you should say things more simply. The reality, of course,
is that the world is complex. These issues are not easy."
|

Apr 18, '16, 7:33 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 8, 2015
Posts: 555
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
Justice Scalia thought as I do, that abortion should be legal in the US, and it was up to the individual states to prohibit it. I trust his judgment over yours, no offense meant, and believe he was an expert in constitutional law.
|
What I bolded in your above statement seems to be more along the
lines of Scalia thinking the Federal Government should not have any say
in the abortion issue because there is nothing in the US Constitution
about abortion, combined with the 10th Amendment which say unless the
Constitution specifically says the Feds can or that the States can not,
it is left to the States or the People. I think this is a Much more
likely scenario than what you have described Scalia's position to be.
|

Apr 18, '16, 8:27 am
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Posts: 433
Religion: Nazarene
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Sorry but when I listen to US Americans talk about "Socialism" I hear
more prejudice than facts. Democratic Socialism is never "imposed" but
chosen by the people in the ballot box. Secondly it is democratic. On
this Forum there is a muddled view of "socialism" which stems from Cold
War attitudes to communism Soviet style. Soviet Communism and Democratic
Socialism are not two peas from the same pod but often in this and
other US forums conflated into an unreality.
As for Catholics being unable to support socialists ideas, well Robert
Frederick Drinan, Jesuit Priest and an elected Member of Congress did.
Was he defrocked ? No. In South America Father Gustavo Gutierrez has
preached the Gospel of Liberation to the Poor and is held in high esteem
by Pope Francis. Just two examples of many Catholic priests who favour a
socialist approach to creating the Kingdom of God on Earth. The
Catholic faithful are a much broader spectrum of humanity than the
narrow visions of the conservative thinkers. There is a tradition in the
UK of Christian Socialism linked to Catholic and Anglo-Catholic clergy.
I find disturbing some of the distortions on this Forum that frankly
stem from ignorance and prejudice and from the ethics of the Cold War.
Apr 18, '16, 10:11 am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: October 7, 2013
Posts: 8,022
Religion: Non practicing Roman Catholic with mainline Christian faith
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
So once again we are asked to ignore the
clear concise quotes of numerous members of the magisterium and church
documents and rely instead upon individuals Catholics personal
interpretation of what a bishop really "meant" when asked about a couple
paragraphs in a USCCB documentv Can you single member of the
magisterium that explicitly says it is licit for Catholics to vote for
pro-abortion candidate if a more pro-life alternative is available ?
And of course no one disagrees that voting for a pro-abortion candidate
when his opponent is more pro-abortion than they are is not formal
corporation with evil As Archbishop Chaput states such a vote is not
voting for the lesser of two evils- it is voting to lessen evil .
|
I have quoted the precise words of a member of the magisterium numerous times.
__________________
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage... it
is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
"The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong."
(Pope Francis)
|

Apr 18, '16, 10:17 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,704
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peccavi
Sorry but when I listen to US Americans
talk about "Socialism" I hear more prejudice than facts. Democratic
Socialism is never "imposed" but chosen by the people in the ballot box.
Secondly it is democratic. On this Forum there is a muddled view of
"socialism" which stems from Cold War attitudes to communism Soviet
style. Soviet Communism and Democratic Socialism are not two peas from
the same pod but often in this and other US forums conflated into an
unreality.
As for Catholics being unable to support socialists ideas, well Robert
Frederick Drinan, Jesuit Priest and an elected Member of Congress did.
Was he defrocked ? No. In South America Father Gustavo Gutierrez has
preached the Gospel of Liberation to the Poor and is held in high esteem
by Pope Francis. Just two examples of many Catholic priests who favour a
socialist approach to creating the Kingdom of God on Earth. The
Catholic faithful are a much broader spectrum of humanity than the
narrow visions of the conservative thinkers. There is a tradition in the
UK of Christian Socialism linked to Catholic and Anglo-Catholic clergy.
I find disturbing some of the distortions on this Forum that frankly
stem from ignorance and prejudice and from the ethics of the Cold War.
|
Touting socialism is like touting the tooth fairy. Real
"socialism" doesn't exist anywhere, and never did. European "socialist"
countries have plenty of wealth privilege. Ordinary people are taxed
heavily to pay for social programs. As a result, they have inadequate
funds for family formation and don't have children to speak of anymore.
Never mind the Nordic countries that have oil wealth and tiny
populations to divide it among or the "hidden banking" nations. Most of
the high taxation states don't have it all that good.
Look at France where taxes are much higher than here and average income
is quite a bit lower. Are short work weeks really worth it?
|

Apr 18, '16, 10:26 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,704
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Tidings
I often wonder about how much money is
needed, too. I think that once they make a tremendous amount of money
the thrill is gone. The next thrill comes from power. They use all that
money to gain power. Nothing is ever going to make them completely
happy.
|
True for some, but not for all. How about billionaire Tom Monaghan
who vowed to "die penniless". He really is keeping his promise.
Remember the probably wealthiest Catholic who ever lived in the U.S. (taking inflation into account) was St. Katherine Drexel.
|

Apr 18, '16, 10:30 am
|
|
Prayer Warrior
Forum Supporter
|
|
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Posts: 48,606
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy Noe
I have quoted the precise words of a member of the magisterium numerous times.
|
Who did not say it was licit for a Catholic to vote for a pro abortion candidate when a more pro life alternative was available.
|

Apr 18, '16, 11:50 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: January 8, 2015
Posts: 555
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peccavi
... Democratic Socialism is never "imposed" but chosen by the people in the ballot box. Secondly it is democratic....
|
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) should be a
great place to live then, after all it is "democratic" and maybe not
even "imposed" upon the people.
|

Apr 18, '16, 11:58 am
|
|
|
|
Join Date: March 22, 2005
Posts: 2,894
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by oliver927
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea
(North Korea) should be a great place to live then, after all it is
"democratic" and maybe not even "imposed" upon the people.
|
**************************************** **************************************** ************
Yes - the Bernie Sanders crowds haven't got a clue about much - they probably DO
think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (north Korea) means
they are a country of freedoms. They only have ONE super delegate -
wonder why that is? asks a burner!
__________________
"What amazed Edward Winslow during the summer of 1622 was how "reasonable men will be led to reason against their own safety." MAYFLOWER by Nathaniel Philbrick
|

Apr 18, '16, 1:03 pm
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: January 21, 2013
Posts: 11,614
Religion: other
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by grotto
**************************************** **************************************** ************
Yes - the Bernie Sanders crowds haven't got a clue about much - they probably DO
think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (north Korea) means
they are a country of freedoms. They only have ONE super delegate -
wonder why that is? asks a burner!
|
There is a difference between Stalinist communism and a democratic welfare state with a mixed economy.
|

Apr 18, '16, 1:30 pm
|
 |
Veteran Member
Radio Club Member
|
|
Join Date: April 5, 2005
Posts: 10,387
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Sanders Thread
__________________
It's not hoarding if it's BOOKS.
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:01 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by estesbob
Who did not say it was licit for a Catholic to vote for a pro abortion candidate when a more pro life alternative was available.
|
Bishop Kicanas speaks on a 'vast array of issues' that a Catholic must consider when choosing who to vote.
"Then, preachers can help people to understand the complexity of the
moral issues that face our culture and our society. The idea, obviously,
is not to support any particular candidate, but helping people to see
that the church teaches the dignity of human life from conception to
natural death, which involves a vast array of issues important in the
community in which we live. It’s important to be able to speak
knowledgably about those issues, and then to try to weigh the character
of the person who is running for office – looking at the issues they
propose, as well as their ability to put those issues into action, into
legislation that will make a difference. It’s one thing to hold
positions, it’s another thing to be able to get results. I think
sometimes that’s discouraging, because people may propose positions that
are along the lines of what we hold as a church, in terms of the
dignity of human life, but they’re totally ineffective in being able to
accomplish anything."
Why would he speak on a vast array of issues, when it really just is one issue?
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:03 pm
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 36,704
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
Bishop Kicanas speaks on a 'vast array of issues' that a Catholic must consider when choosing who to vote.
"Then, preachers can help people to understand the complexity of the
moral issues that face our culture and our society. The idea, obviously,
is not to support any particular candidate, but helping people to see
that the church teaches the dignity of human life from conception to
natural death, which involves a vast array of issues important in the
community in which we live. It’s important to be able to speak
knowledgably about those issues, and then to try to weigh the character
of the person who is running for office – looking at the issues they
propose, as well as their ability to put those issues into action, into
legislation that will make a difference. It’s one thing to hold
positions, it’s another thing to be able to get results. I think
sometimes that’s discouraging, because people may propose positions that
are along the lines of what we hold as a church, in terms of the
dignity of human life, but they’re totally ineffective in being able to
accomplish anything."
Why would he speak on a vast array of issues, when it really just is one issue?
|
When one candidate who supports intrinsic evil and his/her opponent does not, then one cannot vote for the one who does.
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:04 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridgerunner
When one candidate who supports intrinsic evil and his/her opponent does not, then one cannot vote for the one who does.
|
So, if the Republican supports torture and the Democrat does not, then one cannot vote for the Republican?
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:14 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossbones
So, if the Republican supports torture and the Democrat does not, then one cannot vote for the Republican?
|
If the Democrat does not support an intrinsic evil, then yes.
Now, if both support such intrinsic evils, then a Christian must look to
limit the evil as best possible. If a Democrat supports abortion
rights, then a million babies being killed obviously outweighs the
support of torture of your mythical GOP candidate.
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:28 pm
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2015
Posts: 6,603
Religion: Roman Catholic
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz912
If the Democrat does not support an intrinsic evil, then yes.
Now, if both support such intrinsic evils, then a Christian must look to
limit the evil as best possible. If a Democrat supports abortion
rights, then a million babies being killed obviously outweighs the
support of torture of your mythical GOP candidate.
|
Can you show us a Church document that specifically states that? Specifically.
http://ncronline.org/news/politics/y...bernie-sanders
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:29 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Posts: 3,822
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz912
If the Democrat does not support an intrinsic evil, then yes.
Now, if both support such intrinsic evils, then a Christian must look to
limit the evil as best possible. If a Democrat supports abortion
rights, then a million babies being killed obviously outweighs the
support of torture of your mythical GOP candidate.
|
So we're trading intrinsic evils?
Your analysis is only correct if the Republican will actually do
something. Not so much during the second Bush term. We did get unjust
wars and torture though.
|

Apr 18, '16, 2:37 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 7,484
Religion: Catholic Since 4/3/10
|
|
Re: Bernie Sanders didn't meet Pope Francis. But he had high praise for Catholic social teaching. [CNA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily Bernans
|
You'll get little traction by linking to a heterodox "catholic" website that promotes disobedience to Church teaching.
And would you take the word of your relative, Fr. Pavone?
http://www.priestsforlife.org/vote/v...conscience.htm
8. Distinguish “choosing evil” from “limiting evil.”
What happens if two opposing candidates both support abortion?
First of all, refrain from putting any labels or endorsements on anyone.
Don't call them anything. Or, if you prefer, call them both
pro-abortion. Then just ask a simple question: Which of the two
candidates will do less harm to unborn children if elected?
For example, is either of the candidates willing at least to ban
late-term abortion? Is either of them willing to put up some roadblocks
to free and easy abortion? Will either support parental notification, or
parental consent, or waiting periods? Has either of them expressed a
desire to support pregnancy assistance centers? How about stricter
regulation of abortion facilities? Has either candidate expressed
support for that idea? Nobody is saying that's the final goal. But ask
these questions just to see whether you can see any benefit of one of
the candidates above the other.
One of the two of them will be elected; there is no question about that.
So you are not free right now, in this race, to really choose the
candidate you want. Forces beyond your control have already limited your
choices. Whichever way the election goes, the one elected will not have
the position we want elected officials to have on abortion.
In this case, it is morally acceptable to vote for the candidate who
will do less harm. This is not "choosing the lesser of two evils." We
may never choose evil. But in the case described above, you would not be
choosing evil. Why? Because in choosing to limit an evil, you are
choosing a good.
You oppose the evil of abortion, in every circumstance, no matter what.
You know that no law can legitimize even a single abortion, ever. If the
candidate thinks some abortion is OK, you don't agree.
But by your vote, you can keep the worse person out. And trying to do
that is not only legitimate, but good. Some may think it's not the best
strategy. But if your question is whether it is morally permissible to
vote for the better of two bad candidates, the answer -- in the case
described above -- is yes.
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment