Thursday, December 15, 2011

Conquering Contributor
Gutsky
Posts: 1,251
Registered: 06-01-2008
"Israel says it will speed up Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - and temporarily freeze the transfer of funds to the Palestinian Authority.

The BBC's Kevin Connolly in Jerusalem says the announcement will be seen as a punishment for the Palestinians and a warning to countries that backed their Unesco bid that Israel will react strongly if a similar application for Palestinian membership of the UN itself should prove successful.

Peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel broke down more than a year ago. The Palestinians are demanding an end to settlement building.

Almost 500,000 Jews live in settlements on occupied territory. The settlements are illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15548585



Boomer Sooner
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake . . ."
--George Washington's Farewell Address
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

Gutsky wrote:
"Israel says it will speed up Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - and temporarily freeze the transfer of funds to the Palestinian Authority.

The BBC's Kevin Connolly in Jerusalem says the announcement will be seen as a punishment for the Palestinians and a warning to countries that backed their Unesco bid that Israel will react strongly if a similar application for Palestinian membership of the UN itself should prove successful.

Peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel broke down more than a year ago. The Palestinians are demanding an end to settlement building.

Almost 500,000 Jews live in settlements on occupied territory. The settlements are illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15548585



Boomer Sooner

That is "disputed" land and according to international law is not occupied.  The Palestinians can't have it both ways.
Brass Contributor
BBOY
Posts: 3,513
Registered: 10-12-2006
Israeli settlements condemned by Western powers

LINK

The US has joined criticism of Israel's decision to accelerate settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem after Palestinians joined UN cultural agency, Unesco.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said the US was "deeply disappointed".
Earlier, the EU said it was "deeply concerned" by the announcement. The UK, France and Germany said it would hinder efforts for peace.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said it was a "basic right of our people".
'Unjustifiable'
Mr Carney told a White House briefing that Israel's decision did not help bring peace talks any nearer.
"Unilateral actions work against efforts to resume direct negotiations, and they do not advance the goal of a reasonable and necessary agreement between the two parties," Mr Carney said.
"That is the only way to achieve the two-state solution that both sides have as their goal."

Israel doesn't want peace all it wants is MORE!
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

BBOY wrote:
Israeli settlements condemned by Western powers

LINK

The US has joined criticism of Israel's decision to accelerate settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem after Palestinians joined UN cultural agency, Unesco.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said the US was "deeply disappointed".
Earlier, the EU said it was "deeply concerned" by the announcement. The UK, France and Germany said it would hinder efforts for peace.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said it was a "basic right of our people".
'Unjustifiable'
Mr Carney told a White House briefing that Israel's decision did not help bring peace talks any nearer.
"Unilateral actions work against efforts to resume direct negotiations, and they do not advance the goal of a reasonable and necessary agreement between the two parties," Mr Carney said.
"That is the only way to achieve the two-state solution that both sides have as their goal."

Israel doesn't want peace all it wants is MORE!

Does Israel call for the death of all Palestinians?  Yes or no will do.
Veteran Contributor
leecomb
Posts: 2,151
Registered: 09-04-2009
Well, it's obvious the answer is NO. But, the white man didn't say that about the American Indian either. We'll see.....:smileywink:
Brass Contributor
BBOY
Posts: 3,513
Registered: 10-12-2006
It acts like the answer is yes.


217treat wrote:

BBOY wrote:
Israeli settlements condemned by Western powers

LINK

The US has joined criticism of Israel's decision to accelerate settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem after Palestinians joined UN cultural agency, Unesco.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said the US was "deeply disappointed".
Earlier, the EU said it was "deeply concerned" by the announcement. The UK, France and Germany said it would hinder efforts for peace.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said it was a "basic right of our people".
'Unjustifiable'
Mr Carney told a White House briefing that Israel's decision did not help bring peace talks any nearer.
"Unilateral actions work against efforts to resume direct negotiations, and they do not advance the goal of a reasonable and necessary agreement between the two parties," Mr Carney said.
"That is the only way to achieve the two-state solution that both sides have as their goal."

Israel doesn't want peace all it wants is MORE!

Does Israel call for the death of all Palestinians?  Yes or no will do.


Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

leecomb wrote:
Well, it's obvious the answer is NO. But, the white man didn't say that about the American Indian either. We'll see.....:smileywink:

I believe there are some surviving Indians.  We are looking at a much more efficient killing machine.
Bronze Star Contributor
malphilos
Posts: 5,925
Registered: 01-30-2009

217treat wrote:

Gutsky wrote:
"Israel says it will speed up Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - and temporarily freeze the transfer of funds to the Palestinian Authority.

The BBC's Kevin Connolly in Jerusalem says the announcement will be seen as a punishment for the Palestinians and a warning to countries that backed their Unesco bid that Israel will react strongly if a similar application for Palestinian membership of the UN itself should prove successful.

Peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel broke down more than a year ago. The Palestinians are demanding an end to settlement building.

Almost 500,000 Jews live in settlements on occupied territory. The settlements are illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15548585



Boomer Sooner

That is "disputed" land and according to international law is not occupied.  The Palestinians can't have it both ways.

No, it's not.

"International law" is only by treaty and international agreement. There is no international treaty or agreement that says it's disputed. Everyone, including thre United States,  but Israel acknowledges it as being illegally occupied.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

malphilos wrote:


No, it's not.

"International law" is only by treaty and international agreement. There is no international treaty or agreement that says it's disputed. Everyone, including thre United States,  but Israel acknowledges it as being illegally occupied.

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2003/2/DISPUTED%20TERRITORIES-%20Forgotten%20Facts%20About%20the%20We  Read this. I like it.
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

Bronze Star Contributor
malphilos
Posts: 5,925
Registered: 01-30-2009

217treat wrote:

malphilos wrote:


No, it's not.

"International law" is only by treaty and international agreement. There is no international treaty or agreement that says it's disputed. Everyone, including thre United States,  but Israel acknowledges it as being illegally occupied.

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2003/2/DISPUTED%20TERRITORIES-%20Forgotten%20Facts%20About%20the%20We  Read this. I like it.

Yes, precisely as I said:

" The international legal system does not outlaw occupation. Rather it uses international conventions and agreements to regulate such situations."

And everyone but Israel says it's an illegal occupation. There's your "international conventions and agreements".
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Brass Contributor
BBOY
Posts: 3,513
Registered: 10-12-2006
Considering the source the information is a little skewed don't you think?



217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.


Bronze Star Contributor
malphilos
Posts: 5,925
Registered: 01-30-2009

217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

That's an intesting bit of twisting. The claim that Jordan illegally occupied the territories pre-supposes that there was a legitimate owner who would be the Palestinians. The article doesn't say that bit though. It would kind of destroy the picture they're trying to paint.

In short the argument of this article is: "They stole it first!".

The irony is that in order for that to be true, the Palestinians must be the legitimate owners, and Israel's occupation is therefor illegal.

Neither of these blurbs supports your "disputed not occupied" complaint. It's not even a legal distinction.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

That's an intesting bit of twisting. The claim that Jordan illegally occupied the territories pre-supposes that there was a legitimate owner who would be the Palestinians. The article doesn't say that bit though. It would kind of destroy the picture they're trying to paint.

In short the argument of this article is: "They stole it first!".

The irony is that in order for that to be true, the Palestinians must be the legitimate owners, and Israel's occupation is therefor illegal.

Neither of these blurbs supports your "disputed not occupied" complaint. It's not even a legal distinction.

How about a tough question?  Are building these settlements killing anybody?  You know, like the Palestinian rockets.
Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]

BBOY wrote:
Considering the source the information is a little skewed don't you think?



217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.




Would that be like your RT links or the great youtube?
Bronze Star Contributor
malphilos
Posts: 5,925
Registered: 01-30-2009

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]

217treat wrote:

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

That's an intesting bit of twisting. The claim that Jordan illegally occupied the territories pre-supposes that there was a legitimate owner who would be the Palestinians. The article doesn't say that bit though. It would kind of destroy the picture they're trying to paint.

In short the argument of this article is: "They stole it first!".

The irony is that in order for that to be true, the Palestinians must be the legitimate owners, and Israel's occupation is therefor illegal.

Neither of these blurbs supports your "disputed not occupied" complaint. It's not even a legal distinction.

How about a tough question we talk about something else?  Are building these settlements killing anybody?  You know, like the Palestinian rockets.

Fixed that for you.

Stealing is still a  crime, even if you don't kill anyone. Not that the IDF hasn't killed anyone, mind you.

And the occupation is still illegal, as you now understand.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Brass Contributor
BBOY
Posts: 3,513
Registered: 10-12-2006

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]
What's wrong with youtube? You watch the news on TV don't you? There's nothing like hearing the lies straight from mouth that spewed them.


217treat wrote:

BBOY wrote:
Considering the source the information is a little skewed don't you think?



217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.




Would that be like your RT links or the great youtube?


Frequent Contributor
217treat
Posts: 735
Registered: 10-11-2011

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

That's an intesting bit of twisting. The claim that Jordan illegally occupied the territories pre-supposes that there was a legitimate owner who would be the Palestinians. The article doesn't say that bit though. It would kind of destroy the picture they're trying to paint.

In short the argument of this article is: "They stole it first!".

The irony is that in order for that to be true, the Palestinians must be the legitimate owners, and Israel's occupation is therefor illegal.

Neither of these blurbs supports your "disputed not occupied" complaint. It's not even a legal distinction.

How about a tough question we talk about something else?  Are building these settlements killing anybody?  You know, like the Palestinian rockets.

Fixed that for you.

Stealing is still a  crime, even if you don't kill anyone. Not that the IDF hasn't killed anyone, mind you.

And the occupation is still illegal, as you now understand.

Not in Israel,and they are the ones that count.
Bronze Star Contributor
malphilos
Posts: 5,925
Registered: 01-30-2009

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]

217treat wrote:

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:

malphilos wrote:

217treat wrote:
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm  Some more info on this matter.

That's an intesting bit of twisting. The claim that Jordan illegally occupied the territories pre-supposes that there was a legitimate owner who would be the Palestinians. The article doesn't say that bit though. It would kind of destroy the picture they're trying to paint.

In short the argument of this article is: "They stole it first!".

The irony is that in order for that to be true, the Palestinians must be the legitimate owners, and Israel's occupation is therefor illegal.

Neither of these blurbs supports your "disputed not occupied" complaint. It's not even a legal distinction.

How about a tough question we talk about something else?  Are building these settlements killing anybody?  You know, like the Palestinian rockets.

Fixed that for you.

Stealing is still a  crime, even if you don't kill anyone. Not that the IDF hasn't killed anyone, mind you.

And the occupation is still illegal, as you now understand.

Not in Israel,and they are the ones that count.

Israel realizes that's not true, they want to live in the community of nations. That's why they strive so hard to portray the occupation as something other than what it is.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Conquering Contributor
pinkfloyd1
Posts: 1,026
Registered: 10-21-2007

Re: Israel To Build Up Settler Homes After UNESCO

[ New ]
And why should we care. Tried of hearing about Isreal this and Isreal that bla... bla.... bla... Who Cares

No comments:

Post a Comment